The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
The Locustidae are, as a rule, more fragile Insects than the Acridiidae,
from which they can be readily distinguished by the characters we have
mentioned in our definition. According to Dufour, there are no air vesicles
connected with the tracheal system in this family; possibly to this it may
be due that none of the family undertake the long flights and migratory
wanderings that have made some of the Acridiidae so notorious. Very little
is known as to the life histories of the members of this extensive family
of Orthoptera. Graber, however, has given some particulars as to the
development of _Platycleis grisea_, and of one or two other species. He
recognises five instars, but his first is probably really the second, as he
did not observe the Insect in its youngest condition. Although his figures
are very poor, we reproduce them, as they give some idea of the mode of
growth of the wings, and of the correlative changes in the thoracic
segments. It will be seen that in the first three of these instars the alar
organs appear merely as prolongations of the sides of the posterior two
thoracic rings, and that in D a great change has occurred in the position
of these segments, so that the alar organs are free processes, the two
posterior thoracic rings being insignificant in size in comparison with the
now greatly developed prothorax. In E the tegmen is shown fully developed,
the positions of some {313}of the rings covered by it being indicated by
the letters _m_, _mt_, _ab′_. These changes are very similar to those we
have described in Acridiidae, the chief difference being the greater
development of the dependent wing-pads previous to the fourth instar.
[Illustration: FIG. 189.—Front of head of _Copiophora cornuta_, female.
Demerara.]
The ocelli in Locustidae are much more imperfect than they are in
Acridiidae, and are frequently rudimentary or nearly totally absent, or
there may be but one instead of three. They are, however, present in a
fairly well-developed state in some species, and this is the case with the
one whose face we portray in Fig. 189, where the anterior of the three
ocelli is quite conspicuous, the other two being placed one on each side of
the curious frontal cone near its base. The peculiar head ornament shown in
this figure exists in both sexes, and something similar occurs in a large
number of Conocephalides. We have not the slightest idea of its import.
Individuals of one or more species of this curious South American genus are
occasionally met with alive in gardens near London. They are, no doubt,
imported as eggs, for they are sometimes met with in the juvenile state,
but in what way they are introduced is not known.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account