The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)Sedgwick, Adam
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 05 (of 10)
Sedgwick, Adam
Animals
[Illustration: FIG. 246.—Micropterous form of _Mesopsocus unipunctatus_.
_a_, _a_, Wings. (After Bertkau.)]
There are several peculiarities connected with the wings. Frequently they
exist, though of no use for flight; some Psocidae that have
perfectly-formed wings are so reluctant to use them that, M‘Lachlan says,
they will allow themselves to be crushed without seeking to escape by
flight. At certain periods, however, some Psocidae float on the wing in
considerable numbers, especially in a moist still atmosphere, and then
drift about like the winged Aphididae, which are frequently found with
them. There is evidence that individuals, or generations, of some of the
winged species occur with only rudimentary wings; although this has been
denied by Kolbe, there can be no doubt about it. The form figured above
(Fig. 246) was described by Bertkau[312] as a distinct genus, but was
afterwards recognised by him[313] to be a short-winged form of _Mesopsocus
unipunctatus_. It is probable that the adult female of this species has the
wings always micropterous, while the male has these organs of the full
size. In other species the condition of the rudimentary wings seems to be
quite constant. The facts concerning the wings of Psocidae are so peculiar
that Kolbe came to the conclusion that the organs exist not because they
are of use for flight, so much as because it is the nature of an Insect to
develop wings.[314]
Some of the species of Psocidae have never any trace of wings. These
apterous forms are mostly included in the division Atropinae, and are
usually very minute; it has been again and again erroneously stated that
they are the young state of winged forms. Hagen kept a large colony of
_Atropos divinatoria_ for some years in confinement, so that he saw
numerous generations as well as many specimens. He found the apterous
condition quite constant.
{395}The association of ocelli with wings is nearly constant in Psocidae.
The genus _Clothilla_—allied to _Atropos_—possesses very rudimentary wings
but no ocelli. Hagen, however, found[315] that in a certain locality no
less than 12 per cent of the individuals of this species were provided with
ocelli,—a most extraordinary variation.
In some of these apterous forms there is found on each side of the
prothorax a tubercular prominence which, according to Hagen, can be
considered only as the rudiment of a wing that never develops. Though no
existing Insect is known to possess rudimentary wings on the prothorax, we
have previously mentioned (p. 344) that in the Carboniferous epoch
appendages of the nature alluded to were not very rare.
A genus of living forms—_Hyperetes_—in which the three thoracic segments
are well developed, but in which there are no alar appendages or rudiments,
is considered by Hagen to be more primitive than the Psocidae found in
amber to which we shall subsequently allude.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account