The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)Sharp, David
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 06 (of 10)
Sharp, David
Animals
Lepidoptera pass a larger portion of their lives in the pupal stage than
most other Insects do; frequently during nine months of the year the
Lepidopteron may be a pupa. In other Orders of {306}Insects it would appear
that the tendency of the higher forms is to shorten the pupal period, and
when much time has to be passed between the end of the feeding up of the
larva and the appearance of the imago, to pass this time as much as
possible in the form of a resting-larva, and as little as may be in the
form of a pupa; in Lepidoptera the reverse is the case; the resting-larva
period being usually reduced to a day or two. Hence we can understand the
importance of a hard skin to the pupa. There are, however, numerous
Lepidopterous pupae where the skin does not attain the condition of
hardness that is secured for the higher forms by the chitinous exudation we
have mentioned; and there are also cases where there is a prolonged
resting-larva period: for instance _Galleria mellonella_ spins a cocoon in
the autumn and remains in it as a resting larva all the winter, becoming a
pupa only in the spring. In many of these cases the resting-larva is
protected by a cocoon. It is probable that the chief advantage of the
perfect chitinous exudation of the Lepidopterous pupa is to prevent the
tiny, complex organisation from the effects of undue transpiration.
Bataillon has suggested that the relation of the fluid contents of the pupa
to air and moisture are of great importance in the physiology of
metamorphosis.
The duration of life is very different in various forms of Lepidoptera. It
is known that certain species (_Ephestia kuehniella_, _e.g._) may go
through at least five generations a year. On the other hand, certain
species that feed on wood or roots may take three years to complete their
life-history; and it is probable that some of the forms of Hepialidae are
even longer lived than this.
Lepidoptera have always been a favourite Order with entomologists, but no
good list of the species has ever been made, and it would be a difficult
matter to say how many species are at present known, but it can scarcely be
less than 50,000. In Britain we have about 2000 species.
The close affinity of the Order with Trichoptera has long been recognised:
Réaumur considered the latter to be practically Lepidoptera with aquatic
habits, and Speyer pointed out the existence of very numerous points of
similarity between the two. Brauer emphasised the existence of mandibles in
the nymph of Trichoptera as an important distinction: the pupa {307}of
_Micropteryx_ (Fig. 211) has however been recently shown to be similar to
that of Trichoptera, so that unless it should be decided to transfer
_Micropteryx_ to Trichoptera, and then define Lepidoptera and Trichoptera
as distinguished by the condition of the pupa, it would appear to be very
difficult to retain the two groups as distinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account