The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)Boulenger, George Albert
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)
Boulenger, George Albert
Animals
The broadly lobate pectoral fin of the existing Crossopterygii (Fig. 146,
G) is uniserial, closely resembling that of the more typical
Elasmobranchs.[219] There are three basal elements, a propterygium, a
mesopterygium, and a metapterygium, each of which supports a series of
partially ossified radialia. Little is known of the endoskeletal elements
of the broadly or acutely lobate fins of the fossil Crossopterygii, but it
seems probable that their disposition was uniserial and abbreviate in
obtusely lobate fins and biserial in acutely lobate fins. In the remaining
Teleostomi (Actinopterygii) the endoskeletal elements become {244}gradually
reduced in number and importance, their place as fin-supports being usurped
by the dermal fin-rays. In addition, more than three, usually several,
basal elements articulate directly with the pectoral girdle, and hence the
fins become multi-basal. In the Chondrostei and the Holostei a
metapterygium is always recognisable, supporting several radialia along its
preaxial border, as in _Acipenser_ (Fig. 146, D) and _Amia_ (Fig. 146, E),
or only a single one, as in _Lepidosteus_ (Fig. 146, F). The anterior part
of the fin is supported by a variable number of cartilaginous or bony
radialia, which, with the metapterygium, articulate with the limb-girdle.
In Teleosts the process of reduction reaches its maximum. Usually there is
but a single row of short, hour-glass-shaped ossicles, of which the
postaxial one may represent a vestigial metapterygium, and sometimes there
is also a distal row of small cartilages or ossicles, partially hidden in
the cleft bases of the dermal fin-rays (Fig. 146, H). In all these Fishes
the fin is a much reduced uniserial fin, in which more or fewer of the
preaxial radialia have acquired a direct secondary connexion with the
pectoral girdle. Of living Dipnoids _Neoceratodus_ has a nearly typical
biserial fin, but, as seems to be the case in all fins of this type at
present known, there is a marked absence of symmetry in the number and
disposition of the radialia on the two sides of the axis. There is also
much individual variation. No two fins are precisely alike, and the
radialia may sometimes divide. In the very acutely lobate fins of the
remaining Dipnoids it is evident that great reduction has taken place.
_Protopterus_ has lost all trace of postaxial radialia, and in
_Lepidosiren_ even the preaxial have atrophied, leaving only the long
jointed axis to represent the originally biserial fin.
[Illustration: FIG. 147.—The left pectoral fin of _Neoceratodus_. _a_, _b_,
First two segments of the axis; _FS_, preaxial horny fibres; †, †, pre- and
post-axial radialia. (After Wiedersheim.)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account