The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)Boulenger, George Albert
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)
Boulenger, George Albert
Animals
{245}THE PELVIC FINS.—In the simplicity of their endoskeletal supports the
pelvic fins of _Cladoselache_ are the most primitive type of paired fins at
present known (Fig. 145, B). In general structure they resemble the
pectorals, but the radialia are fewer in number, less modified by
concentration, and exhibit little, if any, trace of basal fusion. Add to
such features as these the apparent absence of any trace of pelvic
rudiments, or of basipterygia, and it will be obvious that the pelvic fins
differ but little from the median fins of the same Fish except that they
are paired. In _Pleuracanthus_ the pelvic fins differ from the
corresponding pectorals in being uniserial instead of biserial (Fig. 250).
All other Elasmobranchs, including the Holocephali, have uniserial fins,
which consist of a large metapterygium, supporting a preaxial fringe of
segmented radialia. A propterygium is sometimes present, notably in some of
the Skates and Rays, and, like the metapterygium, it is directly connected
with the pelvic girdle.
[Illustration: FIG. 148.—Skeleton of a pelvic fin of _Polyodon folium_,
ventral view, with the anterior margin of the fin to the right; to show the
partial fusion of the proximal portions of primitively distinct radialia to
form a basipterygium. _b_, Inner or mesial extremity of the basipterygium;
_d.p_, dorsally directed, rudimentary iliac process; _n_, foramen for
nerves. (After Rautenfeld.)]
The skeleton of the pelvic fins of the Teleostomi is often extremely
degenerate. It is perhaps best developed in the Chondrostei,[220] where
each fin is supported by numerous segmented radialia, more or fewer of
which fuse towards the base of the fin, and those form a large and slightly
ossified basipterygium (Fig. 148). In the living Crossopterygii, Holostei,
and Teleostei, the pelvic fins are similar in essential structure, but are
very degenerate. The basipterygium is usually well developed and is always
bony (Fig. 149), and in many Teleosts it acquires so extensive a sutural
connexion with its fellow that, physiologically, it supplies the place of a
true pelvic girdle. At its distal end there may be a single row of small
cartilaginous or bony nodules, representing vestigial radialia, as in the
Crossopterygii, Holostei, and {246}Teleostei, but even these may be absent,
and the dermal fin-rays then articulate directly with the basipterygium.
Little is known of the skeleton of the pelvic fins in the fossil
Crossopterygii, but there is evidence of the existence of a higher grade of
structure than in their surviving allies. In _Eusthenopteron_,[221] for
example, the fin is supported by an axis of at least three bony segments,
with at least three ossified preaxial radialia; hence, it has obviously
undergone less degeneration than in _Polypterus_, where the fin-skeleton is
essentially Teleostean. In the Dipnoi the pelvic fins are similar to the
corresponding pectoral fins, but individual variation is more marked and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account