The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)Boulenger, George Albert
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 07 (of 10)
Boulenger, George Albert
Animals
lost parts, confirms the conclusion that this animal belongs to the
Hemichordata. He gives reasons, however, for believing that it is in the
adult _Phoronis_ rather than in the larval Actinotrocha that it is possible
to discover the most satisfactory evidence of this affinity.
The metamorphosis[57] of Actinotrocha is very remarkable, and is
accompanied by the eversion of a ventral ingrowth of the body-wall. A loop
of the alimentary canal passes into this eversion, which becomes the main
part of the body of the adult; and the anus is thereby brought relatively
nearer the mouth than in the larva. The occurrence of this process may help
to explain the position of the anus in the Pterobranchia.
AFFINITIES OF THE HEMICHORDATA.—There can be no doubt that some of the
resemblances, in structure and in development, between Balanoglossus and
certain Vertebrates are extremely striking. The view that Balanoglossus is
related to the ancestors of Vertebrates[58] appears to exclude other
views[59] which have been suggested with regard to the same question. The
Balanoglossus-theory does not explain the similarity between the
segmentation and the excretory systems of Vertebrates and Chaetopods; but,
on the contrary, there are important characters which Vertebrates share
with Balanoglossus but with no other "Invertebrates." Of these the most
important appear to be the resemblances between the gill-slits and
gill-bars of Balanoglossus and Amphioxus; the position, structure and mode
of development of the central nervous system; and the presence of a
structure in the Hemichordata, which may be regarded as the notochord.
{31}There are other points in which Balanoglossus specially resembles
Amphioxus, such as the early development, the mode of formation of the
body-cavities,[60] and the presence of numerous generative organs.
All these, taken together, make it necessary to consider carefully the
claims of Balanoglossus to relationship with the ancestors of Vertebrates
in making any speculations on this interesting problem.
However improbable it may appear at first sight, it is possible to hold the
view that Balanoglossus is related at the same time to Vertebrates and to
Starfishes and other Echinoderms. The similarity between a young Tornaria
and a young Bipinnaria-larva of a Starfish is so great as to have misled
even Johannes Müller. The more obvious resemblances are the almost
identical course of the longitudinal ciliated band in the young stages, and
the presence of a dorsal pore. The Echinoderm-larva is not, however,
provided with eye-spots, nor has it the posterior, or transverse, ciliated
band of Tornaria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account