The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 09 (of 10)Evans, A. H. (Arthur Humble)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 09 (of 10)
Evans, A. H. (Arthur Humble)
Animals; Birds
The Sub-class _NEORNITHES_ may be arranged, as above stated, in three
divisions, (A) NEORNITHES RATITAE, (B) NEORNITHES ODONTOLCAE, and (C)
NEORNITHES CARINATAE. The first of these contains the Ratite Birds proper
and possibly part of the so-called _STEREORNITHES_ of Patagonia (p. 43),
with several fossil forms of doubtful position from England, France, and
New Mexico, as will be seen below; the second the _HESPERORNITHES_ of the
Cretaceous Shales of Kansas, the _ENALIORNITHES_ of the Cambridge Upper
Greensand, and _Baptornis_ of the American Chalk; the third the
_ICHTHYORNITHES_ of the aforesaid Kansas deposits, and all other existing
Birds, with various extinct species closely allied to them.
Of the points of distinction between the Neornithes and the Archaeornithes
the most important are that the metacarpals are fused together, the second
digit being the longest, and the third more or less reduced; and that the
number of caudal vertebrae does not, as far as is known, exceed thirteen,
of which the last five or six combine together to form a pygostyle, except
in the Hesperornithes, Ratitae, and Tinamidae, where such is seldom the
case.[14] The _centra_ of the vertebrae also are concave on one side only,
except in _Ichthyornis_, and perhaps in _Enaliornis_. The possession of
teeth is, of course, exceptional, as is the remarkable loss of the keel of
the sternum in the Ratitae.
It is now generally, if not universally, agreed that Flightless Birds were
developed from those that could fly. It does not, however, necessarily
follow that the Neornithes are direct {26}descendants of the
Archaeornithes, as each may be a separate offshoot from the same parent
stem. All we can safely assert is, that the former were in existence about
the end of the Jurassic times, that teeth were still retained in some cases
during the Cretaceous Epoch, and that not only normal forms, but also
flightless forms without keel or pygostyle,[15] had arisen by that date.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account