The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 09 (of 10)Evans, A. H. (Arthur Humble)
Science
The Cambridge natural history, Vol. 09 (of 10)
Evans, A. H. (Arthur Humble)
Animals; Birds
It will be remembered that, in the arrangement here followed, Dr. Gadow
placed the _STEREORNITHES_ under the head of Neornithes Ratitae, though not
under that of Ratitae in the restricted {44}sense; but it should be noted
that their systematic position was not by any means assured, though
justified by what was then known of these extraordinary fossils, of which
the sternum has not even yet been brought to light. Remains of various
forms, chiefly of gigantic size, have been disinterred from the Miocene
strata of Santa Cruz in Patagonia, one of which (_Phororhachos_) was
described in 1887 by Dr. Ameghino,[37] from its mandible as an Edentate
Mammal, though four years later[38] he arrived at the more correct
conclusion that the jaw was to be referred to a bird. In 1891, moreover,
Señores Moreno and Mercerat[39] proposed a new Order with the name of
_Stereornithes_, when publishing a series of fine plates; while Dr.
Ameghino, who criticised their work, reduced the nine genera created
therein to the smaller number of three.[40] Another paper by the author
last named,[41] and two by Mr. Lydekker[42] should be consulted by those
interested in the details of the subject, while an admirable summary will
be found in Professor Newton's _Dictionary of Birds_. In a review of Dr.
Ameghino's paper on these birds,[43] Mr. C. W. Andrews stated that
_Phororhachos_ and others of the "Stereornithes" were not truly Ratite, but
were Carinate forms in which the wings had undergone reduction, and
suggested that possibly they were related to the parent stock of the
Gruiformes, approximating particularly to _Cariama_ (_Dicholophus_).
Shortly afterwards Dr. Ameghino's collection was acquired by the British
Museum, and a study of the specimens themselves has not caused the reviewer
to change his opinion.[44] Some members of the group (e.g. _Mesembriornis_)
are perhaps truly Ratite, and one at least (_Dryornis_) belongs to the
_Cathartidae_. _Phororhachos_ is remarkable for the immense size and heavy
build of the skull, to which the legs, huge though they sometimes are, bear
no proportion; the maxilla is exceedingly compressed, yet very deep, and
ends in a strong hook, while the long massive mandible curves upwards to
meet it. There is a quite or nearly complete interorbital septum in this
case, as opposed to _Apteryx_, and, to a considerable extent, to the
Dinornithidae; {45}while the nostrils are pervious, and the quadrate
articulates with the skull by two heads, contrary to what occurs in the
Ratitae proper. The furcula is existent, but extremely slender; the
metatarsus is more or less elongated, the hallux is present, the wings are
small but well developed, and the tail is said to be long, with a
considerable number of separate vertebrae.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account