The Camel and the Needle's EyePonsonby, Arthur Ponsonby, Baron
Philosophy
The Camel and the Needle's Eye
Ponsonby, Arthur Ponsonby, Baron
Wealth; Wealth -- Moral and ethical aspects
The rich man’s so-called charity therefore must be to a large extent
mechanical and conventional. He gives because others with the same
means give, and the charity touts know how a list headed by Lord A.
with a substantial sum will produce equally or perhaps even more
substantial sums from Lord B., Sir. C. D., Alderman E., and Mr. F. The
extraction of money from the rich is a business in itself, requiring
considerable skill, and the rich are fleeced far more than they
realise. In practical America they take the trouble to teach people
professionally how to write what they call “letters of appeal.” When we
hear of subscriptions to charities being stopped it may serve to remind
us that it is most inexpedient that institutions such as hospitals
should be at the mercy of the casual caprice of rich men. Nothing could
eventually be more desirable than that every one of them should cut
off their charitable contributions. It might entail a severe temporary
shock to the funds of charitable institutions, as over seven millions
a year is being spent in London alone on charities, but at the same
time many ill-managed and misdirected endeavours would disappear, and
the State would come to realise all the sooner its responsibilities
in respect to the maintenance of really necessary institutions for
the relief of suffering and the nursing of the sick, in the same way
as it is beginning to recognise its duties towards poverty, old age,
and unemployment. There are other enterprises which the State should
undertake that are often delayed in their institution owing to the plea
that the private munificence of rich men can be depended upon. It is
certainly better that the funds should be expended thus than in sheer
self-indulgence, but it is evident that the money would be far better
spent and the object on which it is spent better served if the source
were not controlled by the whims and fancies of a single individual.
In regard to the more private and personal aspects of the generosity
attributed to riches: “Surely,” a critic will say, “if the rich man
is benevolent and kindly disposed he can in a hundred thoughtful ways
help his poorer friends by presents, by attention and timely help, by
opening the doors of his houses, lending his conveyances, and showing
many other attentions which his money allows him to do, thereby
becoming justly popular and a source of great good.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account