The Camel and the Needle's EyePonsonby, Arthur Ponsonby, Baron
Philosophy
The Camel and the Needle's Eye
Ponsonby, Arthur Ponsonby, Baron
Wealth; Wealth -- Moral and ethical aspects
But it is easier to disregard all this and to go on in what appears
to be the natural and, indeed, inevitable course. We must take the
world as it is, is the common cry, not as it ought to be, and unless
we are prepared to be submerged and trodden under, we must follow in
the throng and push forward and struggle with the rest. Some of us are
able to feel resentment at A’s riches, but, alas! it is not because
he is _rich_, but because _he_ is rich. It is said that the craving
to satisfy material wants is as inseparable a part of human nature as
any other appetite. This may be so to some extent, but it is clearly a
matter of proportion. After the appetite has reached a certain point
it is no more natural than gluttony, drunkenness, or any other form of
debauchery. In far too many cases that point has long been passed and a
state of society has been evolved to suit the new order, and not only
to excuse, but to extol and strengthen the power of money.
Let men live, whatever kind of life they choose, without interference,
let them indulge their hobbies and amuse themselves within bounds; but
let them recognise that there _are_ bounds, and that the inter-cohesion
of the isolated atoms in the whole mass of human life is such that
every step they take over those bounds they are depriving someone
else of living the life _they_ choose, indulging _their_ hobbies, and
amusing _themselves_.
The rich are mostly unconscious of the harm they are doing. There is no
deliberate intention in any of their actions. They travel carelessly
along the broad road laid down for them by custom, and they never count
the costs or examine the consequences. Their lives, more especially
those of their women, are entirely aimless and certainly devoid of
any determined motive. As long as they are allowed to pursue their
course undisturbed, making or spending the money which they look on as
their own in any way that suits their fancy, they make no complaint.
They ask the State to guard them securely in the enjoyment of their
great possessions, and they employ the energy they derive from them
in poisoning the springs of national prosperity. The moment it is
suggested that some small share of their gains should be taken by the
State for the general benefit and for safeguarding the security of
others besides themselves, they, including even those of them who have
declared their wealth to be a burden, send up a wail of execration and
protest with all the force they have at their command.
This condition of things, as it has been shown, brings no happiness
to the rich and it brings great mischief to the State. Individual
energy is dissipated and human capacity is misapplied in a society
where effort is so ill-directed in the extremes of riches and poverty;
while the social power of the community is wasted in a society where
capitalists control so many of the sources of wealth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account