"The third course, on the other hand, presented every advantage:
the French army, once in possession of Milan, would secure all the
magazines, depots, and hospitals, of the enemy's army; it would join
the left under General Moncey, and have a safe retreat by the Simplon
and St. Gothard. The Simplon led to the Valais and Sion, whither
all the magazines of provisions for the army had been sent. The St.
Gothard led into Switzerland, of which we had been in possession for
two years, and which was covered by the Army of the Rhine then on the
Iller. In this position the French general was at liberty to act as
he pleased; if Melas should march with his whole army from Turin upon
the Sesia and the Ticino, the French army could give him battle with
this incalculable advantage, that, if it should be victorious, Melas,
with his retreat cut off, would be pursued and driven into Savoy; and
if it should be defeated, it could retreat by the Simplon and the St.
Gothard. If Melas, as it was natural to suppose, should move towards
Alessandria in order to join the army coming from Genoa, it might be
hoped that, by advancing towards him and crossing the Po, he might
be met and be forced to fight before he could reach Alessandria. (In
other words, before the troops of Melas, and of General Ott, coming
from Genoa, could unite at Alessandria.) The French army having its
rear secured by the river, and by Milan, the Simplon, and the St.
Gothard; while the Austrian army, having its retreat cut off, and
having no communications with Mantua and Austria, would be liable
to be thrown upon the mountains of the western coast of Genoa, or
entirely destroyed, or taken at the foot of the Alps, at the Col
di Tenda and in the county of Nice. Lastly, by adopting the third
course, if it should suit the First Consul, when once master of
Milan, to suffer Melas to pass, and to remain between the Po, the
Adda, and the Ticino, he would thus, without a battle, reconquer
Lombardy, and Piedmont, the Maritime Alps, and the Genoese territory,
and raise the blockade of that city; these were flattering results to
anticipate."
Bonaparte has been severely criticised for not taking the second
course, which he has so briefly discussed in his memoirs. It has
been represented that in marching on Milan, he sacrificed Masséna,
when he might have marched directly to the relief of Genoa by way of
Alessandria, and thus have saved his lieutenant the humiliation of a
surrender. But what are the facts? They are that Melas sent orders to
General Ott to raise the siege of Genoa before the Army of Reserve
had even reached Milan. Had, therefore, Bonaparte crossed the Po at
Chivasso, attacked and driven back Melas, and marched on Alessandria,
he could not have brought relief to Masséna any earlier.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account