The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
“As the day ended, the situation of the opposing forces was somewhat
as follows: Blücher had used up in the villages 38,000 infantry,
who had suffered considerably, had in great part expended their
ammunition, and must be looked upon as useless, in which there
was not much more force. 6,000 infantry were stationed behind the
villages, scattered in single battalions which had however not yet
fought. The rest of the 56,000 men of the Ist and IId army corps were
cavalry and artillery, of which only a small part was fresh.
“If the IIId army corps had been collected, or if it had been
sufficiently provided for, it would have been a reserve of about
18,000 men; it could therefore have been said that Blücher had still
24,000 men in reserve.
“Bonaparte, although originally some few thousand men weaker than
Blücher, had now, however, several thousand more fresh troops than
that general: the cause of this was his keeping back more men, a
greater economy of forces in the firing.
“This small[394] superiority of reserves would naturally not have
decided much, but it must nevertheless be looked on as the first
cause of the victory.
“The second reason was the unequal result which the firing had up to
that time produced.
“It is true that when Bonaparte advanced against Ligny we still
occupied part of this village, but we had then lost the rest; it
is true that we still occupied a position between Wagnelée and St.
Amand, but here, too, we had lost villages and ground; the engagement
had therefore turned out everywhere a little to our disadvantage, and
in such a case the preparations for the deciding blow are already
made.
“The third and most important reason was, however, without doubt, the
fact that Blücher did not have at his disposal the troops which had
not yet fought, namely, the IIId Corps. It is true that the XIIth
brigade was very near him, but that was too little: the IXth was also
not far away; but of this, as well as of the whole of Thielemann’s
Corps, there had been no thought; and the IIId Corps, therefore,
as regards a decisive blow to be given by it, was as good as out
of reach and could be used only for the retreat. Perhaps and very
probably, this scattered disposition of Thielemann is to be looked
upon as on the whole an actual advantage. If the IIId Corps had been
at hand, it would have been employed also, without increasing the
chances for a successful result, which, considering the turn which
the whole affair had taken, could have been secured only by a decided
superiority, such, in fact, as the arrival of Bülow’s Corps would
have procured. And if the IIId Corps had been used, the loss in
battle would probably have been greater by 10,000 men.”
We cannot leave this subject without calling attention to a remark[395]
of Marshal Davout’s in his criticism of the Emperor’s conduct of this
campaign. He speaks of him in connection with this battle as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account