What is the tie that binds? Is it the hope of an Imperial Federation,
which shall bind the whole British Empire into such a world federation
as now holds the provinces of the Dominion? Twenty years ago, if you
had asked that, the answer might have been "Yes." Canada was in the
dark financially and did not see her way out. If only the Chamberlain
scheme of a tariff against the world, free trade within the empire,
could have evolved into practical politics, Canada for purely practical
reasons would have welcomed Imperial Federation. It would have given
her exports a wonderful outlet. But to-day Imperial Federation is a
deader issue in Canada than reciprocity with the United States. No
more books are written about it. No one speaks of it. No one wants
it. No one has time for it. The changed attitude of mind is well
illustrated by an incident on Parliament Hill, Ottawa, one day.
A Cabinet Minister was walking along the terrace above the river
talking to a prominent public man of England.
"How about Imperial Federation?" asked the Englishman. "Do you want
it?"
The Canadian statesman did not answer at once. He pointed across the
Ottawa, where the blue shimmering Laurentians seem to recede and melt
into a domain of infinitude. "Why _should_ we want Imperial
Federation?" he answered. "We have an empire the size of Europe, whose
problems we must work out. Why should Canadians go to Westminster to
legislate on a deceased wife's sister's bills and Welsh
disestablishment and silly socialistic panaceas for the unfit to
plunder the fit?"
It will be noticed that his answer had none of that flunkeyism to which
Goldwin Smith used to ascribe much of Canadian pro-loyalty. Rather was
there a grave recognition of the colossal burden of helping a nation
the area of Europe to work out her destiny in wisdom and in integrity
and in the certainty that is built up only from rock bottom basis of
fact.
Has flunkeyism any part in the pro-loyalty of Canada? Goldwin Smith
thought it had, and we all know Canadians whose swelling lip-loyalty is
a sort of Gargantuan thunder. It may be observed, parenthetically,
those Canadians are not the personages who receive recognition from
England.
"Sorry, Your Royal Highness, sorry; but Canada is becoming horribly
contaminated by Americanizing influences," apologized a pro-loyalist of
the lip-flunkey variety to the Duke of Connaught shortly after that
scion of royalty came to Canada as Governor.
The Duke of Connaught turned and looked the fussy lip-loyalist over.
"What's good enough for Americans is good enough for me," he said.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account