This dualism of resultance and emergence is merely a new verbal vesture for the hylomorphic dualism of Aristotle. The _additive_ properties (_resultants_) are based on _matter_, which is the principle of _continuity_. The _specificative_ (constituitive or qualitative) properties called emergents are rooted in _entelechy_ (form), which is the principle of _novelty_. In fact, entelechy (form) itself is _an emergent of matter_ just as the specificative properties are _emergents_ of matter, with the sole difference that _entelechy_ is _the primary emergent_ of matter, whereas the specificative or qualitative properties are _secondary emergents_. For in Aristotelian philosophy, entelechy is not, as it is in Neo-vitalism, “an alien principle inserted into matter” abruptly and capriciously “at the level of life,” but a _primary emergent_ and _constituent_ of matter both living and non-living. In fine, entelechy is an _emergent_ of matter in all the units of nature from the simplest atom to the most complex plant or animal organism. The only entelechy, which is not an _emergent_, but an _insert_ into matter, is the _spiritual human soul_. Neither the human soul nor the _superorganic_ functions rooted in it, namely, abstraction, reflection, and election, are _emergents_. Here we have _novelty without continuity_, and therefore not _emergence_ (eduction), but _insertion_ (infusion). In his “Emergent Evolution,” 1923, Lloyd Morgan lays it down as axiomatic that _emergence involves continuity_—“There may often be resultants,” he says, “without emergence; but there are no emergents that do not involve resultant effects also. Resultants give quantitative continuity which underlies new constitutive steps in emergence.” (_Op. cit._, p. 5.) Now our proofs for human spirituality consist precisely in the _complete exclusion of quantitative continuity_ between _organic_ functions (_e. g._ sensation) and _superorganic_ functions (_e. g._ conceptual thought and free volition). Hence, by the very axiom which Morgan himself formulates, the human soul and its _superorganic functions_ are excluded from the category of material _emergents_. If there can be no emergence without quantitative continuity, then the human soul is not an _emergent from_, but an _insert into_, matter. _Free choice_, too, it is needless to say, is not an _emergent of matter_, but an _expression of the supermaterial nature of the human soul_. So much for the new-old dualism of emergence and resultance.