The Case Against Spirit PhotographsPatrick, C. Vincent
History
The Case Against Spirit Photographs
Patrick, C. Vincent
Parapsychology; Spirit photography; Spiritualism
A new method of procedure in taking spirit photographs was apparently
introduced by one Wyllie, of San Francisco, about 1903. No camera
was used; the plates were unpacked in the dark-room and held by the
sitter, Wyllie simply placing his hands on the plate for some seconds.
On development, a face or faces, more or less blurred, would appear.
These were never larger than the print of a thumb, which suggested to
Dr. Pierce--who was investigating Wyllie’s methods--that they were
possibly produced by chemicals pressed into contact with the plate. He
therefore made Wyllie wash his hands before entering the dark-room,
but the extras still appeared. It would, of course, have been a simple
matter for the medium to have had concealed about his person a slip of
thin card or a small rubber stamp, with an “extra” sketched on it in
some suitable chemical; when in the dark-room this would be palmed and
applied to the plate. Dr. Pierce, however, evidently considered the
results were genuine spirit manifestations, and the next year carried
out a series of experiments by himself in London. Needless to say, he
found that without Wyllie’s mediumship no results could be obtained.
Another modern development, which has been largely exploited by Hope,
of Crewe, is the “psychograph.” For this, again, no camera is used; a
plate is carefully wrapped up, usually sealed, and submitted to the
medium’s influence. The plate is then developed by the victim, and
screeds of writing appear, usually arranged in circles instead of
lines. Sometimes the plate is sent to the medium through the post,
carefully wrapped and sealed, and returned apparently unopened a
few days later. On development, the message appears--and the most
banal rubbish it usually is. Yet many people actually believe that
these productions are the means adopted by higher intelligences to
communicate with us. Surely such folk must be lacking in a sense of
humour?
III.--FRAUD
(C. VINCENT PATRICK)
_A.--General Methods_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account