The Case Against Spirit PhotographsPatrick, C. Vincent
History
The Case Against Spirit Photographs
Patrick, C. Vincent
Parapsychology; Spirit photography; Spiritualism
_Effect on Plates_ _Refracted by _Visibility_
Lenses_
_Infra-red (heat) rays_ v. slight Yes No
_Light rays_ affected Yes Yes
_Ultra-violet rays_ strongly affected Yes No
_X-rays_ affected No No
It appears, then, that ultra-violet rays are suitable for our purpose;
infra-red rays, if present in an amount sufficient to affect a
photographic plate, would make themselves very evident as heat, and may
therefore be ruled out.
Ordinary daylight contains ultra-violet rays, as also does the light
of the arc lamp and magnesium flash; lamplight, gas-light, and the
ordinary electric light, are comparatively deficient in them. But are
we to assume that the spirit form is dependent on finding suitable
rays in the surrounding ether, or can it produce its own? Perhaps
some spiritualist will tell me. This is a point of some practical
importance in examining a reputed spirit photograph; for if the spirit
is self-luminous its features will be evenly illuminated and without
shadows, nor will it cast a shadow on the sitter or background, but
rather the reverse. If, on the other hand, the spirit is dependent
on the presence of ultra-violet rays from other sources, which it
can reflect, then the spirit in the photograph will appear to be
illuminated from the same point as the sitter,[9] and by absorption or
reflection of the ultra-violet actinic rays which would otherwise have
passed on, will cast a shadow on the background. Being a shadow cast by
the removal of the ultra-violet rays only, it will of course appear as
such in the photograph, but be invisible to the eye.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account