“It would appear to be with this secondary self (or selves, if there be
more than one of them) that we have to reckon in dealing with the facts
of automatism rather than with the normal self: a deduction drawn from
the consciousness or unconsciousness of the latter may be altogether
inapplicable to the former. How ready these second selves are to act a
part, and how cleverly they often do so, the experience of hypnotism is
there to show.”
III
“Nearly every woman,” writes Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in “The New
Revelation,” “is an undeveloped medium. Let her try her own powers
of automatic writing.” Doctors have cried out against this dangerous
advice given by one of the medical fraternity, and we have not found
it supported by any leading authority in the ranks of Spiritualism. We
are able to state, on excellent authority, that the late Dr. Alfred
Russel Wallace strongly deprecated any similar attempts by amateurs.
In private conversation he used to tell of a man who, having practised
automatic writing, became absolutely incapable of writing the simplest
note without his hand being used by other agencies. He was not able
to hinder this by his own will, and in order to effect a cure he was
obliged to abstain for years from using a pencil at all. Dr. Russel
Wallace had a strong belief in the existence and activity of malignant
low-grade spirits who seek to gain control over men.
Sir William Barrett, in a very grave passage, discourages “young
persons and those who have little to interest their time and thoughts”
from “making any experiments in this perplexing region.” Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle has never known “a blasphemous, an unkind, or an obscene
message” to be transmitted ostensibly from the other side. Sir W. F.
Barrett has been less fortunate in his experience. “It not infrequently
happens,” writes this great authority, “as some friends of mine found,
that after some interesting and veridical messages and answers to
questions had been given, mischievous and deceptive communications took
place, interspersed with profane and occasionally obscene language.
How far the sitters’ subliminal self is responsible for this, it is
difficult to say; they were naturally disquieted and alarmed, as the
ideas and words were wholly foreign to their thoughts, and they threw
up the whole matter in disgust.”[24]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account