The case of Miss ElliottOrczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
General
The case of Miss Elliott
Orczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
Detective and mystery stories, English; English fiction -- 20th century
“The evidence for the Royal plaintiff was simple enough. It all went
to prove that the very day after the burglary not a jeweller,
pawnbroker, or diamond merchant throughout the whole of Europe could
have failed to know that a unique _parure_ of black diamonds had been
stolen, and would probably be offered for sale. The Black Diamonds in
themselves, and out of their setting, were absolutely unique, and if
the late Mr. Vanderdellen purchased them in Paris from some private
individual, he must at least have very strongly suspected that they
were stolen.
“Throughout the whole of that first day Mrs. Vanderdellen sat in
court, absolutely calm and placid. She listened to the evidence, made
little notes, and chatted with two or three American friends—elderly
men—who were with her.
“Then came the turn of the defence.
“Everybody had expected something sensational, and listened more
eagerly than ever as the name of Mr. Albert V. B. Sedley was called.
He was a tall, elderly man, the regular angular type of the American,
with his nasal twang and reposeful manner.
“His story was brief and simple. He was a great friend of the late Mr.
Vanderdellen, and had gone on a European tour with him in the early
spring of 1902. They were together in Vienna in the month of March,
staying at the Hotel Imperial, when one day Vanderdellen came to his
room with a remarkable story.
“‘He told me,’ continued Mr. Albert V. B. Sedley, ‘that he had just
purchased some very beautiful diamonds, which he meant to present to
his wife on his return to New York. He would not tell me where he
bought them, nor would he show them to me, but he spoke about the
beauty and rarity of the stones, which were that rarest of all things,
beautiful black diamonds.
“‘As the whole story sounded to me a little bit queer and mysterious,
I gave him a word of caution, but he was quite confident as to the
integrity of the vendor of the jewels, since the latter had made a
somewhat curious bargain. Vanderdellen was to have the diamonds in his
keeping for three months without paying any money, merely giving a
formal receipt for them; then, if after three months he was quite
satisfied with his bargain, and there had been no suspicion or rumour
of any kind that the diamonds were stolen, then only was the money,
£500,000, to be paid.
“‘Vanderdellen thought this very fair and above-board, and so it
sounded to me. The only thing I didn’t like about it all was that the
vendor had given what I thought was a false name and no address; the
money was to be paid over to him in French notes when the three months
had expired, at an hotel in Paris, where Vanderdellen would be staying
at the time, and where he would call for it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account