The Cassowary; What Chanced in the Cleft MountainsWaterloo, Stanley
General
The Cassowary; What Chanced in the Cleft Mountains
Waterloo, Stanley
Love stories; Railroad travel -- Fiction; Storytelling -- Fiction
So, worse and worse became the man's condition, greater and greater his
abhorrence of what is counted a delicate bit of eating. On the
twenty-sixth morning he came in with a more closely hovering look of
apprehension than had yet been noticed. He sat down before the bird,
picked at it for a moment, rose from the table walked about for a while;
then came back, again and again, and considered what was before him. He
gasped, and, as he arose to his feet and started from the room,
exclaimed huskily: "It's no use, boys. I was mistaken. I can't do it. I
give up!"
There was pity for him, especially among the minors, for he had done his
best. Many cheques were drawn that morning.
Driscoll always breakfasted at this restaurant and had, naturally,
become interested in this droll struggle between man and quail. For a
day or two after his own loss he had been dazed and discouraged haunting
the lobbies of the Planter's, the Southern or the Lindell, and pitying
himself amazingly. All at once he braced up, to an extent, through the
influence of plucky little Jessie Cameron. "We must begin again--that's
all," said she, resolutely and cheerily. "Surely, you love me as much as
Jacob, who served twice seven years, for Rachel, and I admire you more
than I do Jacob--though I never liked his device concerning Esau. Begin
again, dear, and all will come right."
And Driscoll did begin again with a vigor, though henceforth he referred
to Mr. Cameron as Laban to the indignation of the fair and filial
Jessie.
The lover settled down to earnest work, did well and was becoming
contented and hopeful. This condition of mind enabled him to speculate
in his hours of ease upon something outside of his personal affairs. The
quail-eating contest had interested him, because he was an educated man,
and something of a student of the body. Why had Graham failed in the
eating of thirty quail in thirty days? Men eat thirty breakfasts in
thirty days and do not know they have done it. Hunters and miners eat
bacon alone--that is, as far as their meat goes--for months at a time
and think nothing of it. Why had Graham failed?
Just as a matter of amusement, Driscoll tried to study the thing out:
"Man is omnivorous," he thought; "not a flesh-eater alone, and his range
of consumption is wide. He must have variety, even in flesh, as a
requirement of his stomach. Furthermore, man alone, among all creatures,
is imaginative, and, when forced to eat a certain thing, develops a
thousand fancies against it until it becomes revolting. It might be so,
very likely would be so, in the case of the beefsteak or the bacon. The
only animal which can live easily and uncomplainingly upon one kind of
flesh alone, live cheerfully and healthfully, like the lion or the tiger
or others of the carnivora, must be one accustomed to such purely flesh
diet and one without imagination." And Driscoll was right in his
conclusions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account