The Catholic Church and conversionChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Religion
The Catholic Church and conversion
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Conversion -- Catholic Church
It is true that this general truth was hidden from many by certain
definite assertions. I can only call them, in simple language,
Protestant lies about Catholic lying. The men who repeated them were not
necessarily lying, because they were repeating. But the statements were
of the same lucid and precise order as a statement that the Pope has
three legs or that Rome is situated at the North Pole. There is no more
doubt about their nature than that. One of them, for instance, is the
positive statement, once heard everywhere and still heard often: “Roman
Catholics are taught that anything is lawful if done for the good of the
Church.” This is not the fact; and there is an end of it. It refers to a
definite statement of an institution whose statements are very definite;
and it can be proved to be totally false. Here as always the critics
cannot see that they are trying to have it both ways. They are always
complaining that our creed is cut and dried; that we are told what to
believe and must believe nothing else; that it is all written down for
us in bulls and confessions of faith. In so far as this is true, it
brings a matter like this to the point of legal and literal truth, which
can be tested; and so tested, it is a lie. But even here I was saved at
a very early stage by noticing a curious fact. I noticed that those who
were most ready to blame priests for relying on rigid formulas seldom
took the trouble to find out what the formulas were. I happened to pick
up some of the amusing pamphlets of James Britten, as I might have
picked up any other pamphlets of any other propaganda; but they set me
on the track of that delightful branch of literature which he called
Protestant Fiction. I found some of that fiction on my own account,
dipping into novels by Joseph Hocking and others. I am only concerned
with them here to illustrate this particular and curious fact about
exactitude. I could not understand why these romancers never took the
trouble to find out a few elementary facts about the thing they
denounced. The facts might easily have helped the denunciation, where
the fictions discredited it. There were any number of real Catholic
doctrines I should then have thought disgraceful to the Church. There
are any number which I can still easily imagine being made to look
disgraceful to the Church. But the enemies of the Church never found
these real rocks of offence. They never looked for them. They never
looked for anything. They seemed to have simply made up out of their own
heads a number of phrases, such as a Scarlet Woman of deficient
intellect might be supposed to launch on the world; and left it at that.
Boundless freedom reigned; it was not treated as if it were a question
of fact at all. A priest might say anything about the Faith; because a
Protestant might say anything about the priest. These novels were padded
with pronouncements like this one, for instance, which I happen to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account