The Catholic Church and conversionChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Religion
The Catholic Church and conversion
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Conversion -- Catholic Church
The first fallacy about the Catholic Church is the idea that it is a
church. I mean that it is a church in the sense in which the
Nonconformist newspapers talk about The Churches. I do not intend any
expression of contempt about The Churches; nor is it an expression of
contempt to say that it would be more convenient to call them the sects.
This is true in a much deeper and more sympathetic sense than may at
first appear; but to begin with, it is certainly true in a perfectly
plain and historical sense, which has nothing to do with sympathy at
all. Thus, for instance, I have much more sympathy for small
nationalities than I have for small sects. But it is simply a historical
fact that the Roman Empire was the Empire and that it was not a small
nationality. And it is simply a historical fact that the Roman Church is
the Church and is not a sect. Nor is there anything narrow or
unreasonable in saying that the Church is the Church. It may be a good
thing that the Roman Empire broke up into nations; but it certainly was
not one of the nations into which it broke up. And even a person who
thinks it fortunate that the Church broke up into sects ought to be able
to distinguish between the little things he likes and the big thing he
has broken. As a matter of fact, in the case of things so large, so
unique and so creative of the culture about them as were the Roman
Empire and the Roman Church, it is not controversial but simply correct
to confine the one word to the one example. Everybody who originally
used the word “Empire” used it of that Empire; everybody who used the
word “Ecclesia” used it of that Ecclesia. There may have been similar
things in other places, but they could not be called by the same name
for the simple reason that they were not named in the same language. We
know what we mean by a Roman Emperor; we can if we like talk of a
Chinese Emperor, just as we can if we like take a particular sort of a
Mandarin and say he is equivalent to a Marquis. But we never can be
certain that he is exactly equivalent; for the thing we are thinking
about is peculiar to our own history and in that sense stands alone. Now
in that, if in no other sense, the Catholic Church stands alone. It does
not merely belong to a class of Christian churches. It does not merely
belong to a class of human religions. Considered quite coldly and
impartially, as by a man from the moon, it is much more _sui generis_
than that. It is, if the critic chooses to think so, the ruin of an
attempt at a Universal Religion which was bound to fail. But calling the
wreckers to break up a ship does not turn the ship into one of its own
timbers; and cutting Poland up into three pieces does not make Poland
the same as Posen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account