Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Catholic Church -- Doctrines; Catholic Church -- History
In point of fact, Galileo’s condemnation did not turn upon his teaching
a demonstrated truth, for it was not yet demonstrated. It did not
turn upon a novel idea in Astronomy, but upon an hypothesis which was
already hoary before Galileo was born; and the condemnation was not
originated against the idea as an hypothesis, but against the teaching
of it as an established fact. So much for point _one_.
Next, as to point _two_, the condemnation did not proceed from the
Catholic Church. It proceeded from a particular disciplinary organ
of the Catholic Church, with no authority whatsoever for finally
establishing a point in doctrine. To confuse it with Catholic
definition of doctrine would be like confusing the definition of a
New York court of justice with an amendment to the Constitution. The
Pope himself, as it happened, forbade what would have been a grave
error--though not one binding the Church--I mean, a full definition
of heresy by the inquisitors upon the matter. But all that is neither
here nor there. There was no definition binding upon Christians, and
has been none, nor ever will be in such a purely mechanical affair.
What there _was_ was disciplinary action against a man who had done
everything he could to provoke the constituted authorities of religion
by querulous and bitter insult (he was a difficult character), a
man who was unable to support his own statements in court (nothing
he brought forward at his trial came near to being conclusive on
the motion of the earth, and much that he brought forward was
fantastic),[3] and the action came at the end of an upheaval in which,
by exactly this kind of irrational, angry attitude in graver matters,
the unity of Christendom had been destroyed. No wonder the authorities
had grown touchy. Moreover, as anyone may see who reads the trial (and
as Huxley saw), Galileo could not prove his case. It was still only an
hypothesis.
The theory that the earth was not fixed, but turning on its axis and
moving round the sun, had not only been familiar (as I have said)
to educated[4] Europe from long before Galileo was born, but had
been taught with clerical approval _as an hypothesis_ in Catholic
universities; it was taught again in such universities not long after
the Galileo trial as evidence accumulated, and became a commonplace of
all teaching in Catholic schools and colleges long before the expunging
of the Galilean treatise from the Index--always, and necessarily, a
lengthy process.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account