Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Catholic Church -- Doctrines; Catholic Church -- History
I take it that in the times in which we live the Protestant objection,
even in its vaguest form, is the less formidable. I shall take it
first. I shall conclude with what is, in my own judgment, far the most
formidable attack at this moment, and likely to become still more
formidable in the near future, the Pagan or purely Sceptical attack:
the argument from History that _all_ religion is man-made, that the
Catholic Church must be included in the category of man-made things,
and that therefore the Catholic Church has no claim to Divine Authority.
(a) _The Protestant argument from History._
Throughout the story of the Catholic Church, i.e. during all the last
nineteen hundred years,[5] there have continued recurrent protests
against this or that doctrine: recurrent affirmations that some other
doctrine, contrary to the authoritative definition, is true, and that
the authoritative definition is itself false. From these denials and
affirmations have proceeded what are called, in Catholic terminology,
the various heresies.
But towards the end of the Middle Ages these protests gathered together
in a new form, which was essentially an appeal to History, and to
their general character was applied the term “Protestant.” We need not
quarrel over the term or its derivation. It has been, by universal
agreement, applied during the last four hundred years.
The Protestant challenge to the Catholic Faith is essentially a
challenge based upon History. It proposes to show by historical
evidence that whereas there was some original body of true revelation,
this has been distorted, corrupted and overlaid, and that the Catholic
Church with its perpetual accretions of doctrine, ritual and office is
more and more divergent from, or even contrary to, the divine original
thus presupposed.
The Protestant argument still exists even when it is put in its most
vague and tenuous modern form. Even those who say, as do so many to-day
(believing themselves to be pure sceptics), “I accept the mission of
Jesus Christ as salutary to mankind and as containing eternal verities,
which it is essential that man for his good should know; but I reject
all supernatural statements in connection with this mission,” are still
essentially Protestants.[6] They presuppose some original nucleus,
however restricted on content and in time, which they postulate as good
and true.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account