Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Catholic Church -- Doctrines; Catholic Church -- History
The heresy, after nearly three hundred years of vigour, has gone to
pieces. The Bible outside the Catholic Church has lost authority. The
original Catholic position remains. Indeed, there is a comic irony in
noting that it is we Catholics to-day who are thought old-fashioned in
maintaining our respect for the text of Scripture and in being slow to
admit all the modern guess-work in derogation of it. So much for the
test of Innovation.
(2) I turn to the second test, the test of Critical Date.
If it be true that the Catholic Church is the warping and corruption of
an originally delivered truth, then that warping and corruption must
have had an origin.
I am walking by night along a road which is laid out upon the map for
miles due east and west; but after so walking for some time I begin to
notice by the stars that the road is bending. It turns more and more
southward. The map has misled me. In such a case I can, when daylight
returns, retrace my steps and I shall find the point of flexion. I may
not be able to establish it to a yard, nor even, if the process be at
first very gradual, to a quarter of a mile; but I shall at least be
able to say, “Up to this point it was dead straight, pointing west.
After this point (say, as much as a mile further on) it is clearly
bending south of west, and I find it bending more and more southward
as I proceed.” If not a point at least a section of flexion can be
established.
Now there is this remarkable historical fact about the process of the
Catholic Church--that its Protestant opponents, all agreeing in its
loss of direction, cannot agree as to when that loss began. There is
not and apparently cannot be any general conclusion upon so simple
an historical matter as to even the main historical section--first
century, second, third, fourth, eleventh--in which this point of
flexion lies. For one body of Protestant thought it is found in what
they call “Counter-Reformation” of the sixteenth century. It was then
that the Catholic Church went wrong, with its exaggeration of Papal
power, of Eucharistic ritual, its more mechanical organisation of the
Sacrament of Penance, and all the rest of it. In the fifteenth century
the Church of England, of France, of Castille were all (rightly) in
communion and their common authority was sound. By 1600 it was lost.
For another set of Protestants the change was the opening of the Middle
Ages--what is called the “Hildebrandine Movement” of 1050–85. Until
then Christendom was proceeding in consonance with its tradition.
The see of Peter had Primacy indeed, but had not developed a highly
detailed jurisdiction over a vast number of personal and national
affairs. The discipline of celibacy among the clergy in the West (so
they tell us) had been optional; its universal enforcement was a
corruption. The monastic institution had been free and sincere; it
slowly became, after that date, enslaved to the Papal power and to
Mammon, and was more and more a scandal of insincerity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account