Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Catholic Church -- Doctrines; Catholic Church -- History
Secondly, that though the general Sceptical attack is by far the more
important, yet it needs less space in writing for the meeting of it
than does the discussion of the old Protestant attitude. The reason
is that the issue between the Faith and mere scepticism is narrower
and sharper, and at the same time more general. If you are debating
whether the Church declined or was corrupted you must go into more
historical detail. You must in some degree, even in so short an essay
as this, be concrete. But on the other and larger issue you have a
very simple and direct “yes” or “no”; which is, briefly, the answer
to that old, eternal question “whether religion be from God or from
man”; and upon the answer to that question depends the future of our
civilisation.--_The Editor._
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND HISTORY
I
1. By the term “The Church” I mean the Catholic Church; and by the
Catholic Church I mean that visible society real, one, and clearly
present before the world to-day, which is in communion with the
Apostolic See of Rome, and accepts not only the supremacy of that
see but also the Infallibility of its occupant when, as shepherd and
teacher of all Christians, and speaking in that capacity, he defines a
matter in faith or morals.
2. The Church claims Divine Authority. She says:
“I alone know fully and teach those truths essential to the life and
final happiness of the soul. I alone am that Society wherein the human
spirit reposes in its native place; for I alone stand in the centre
whence all is seen in proportion and whence the chaotic perspective of
things falls into right order. Mankind cannot feed upon itself--for
that is death at last. I alone provide external sustenance from that
which made mankind. The soil of my country alone can fully nourish
mankind. Here, in me, alone is reality. For I alone am not man-made but
am of direct divine foundation and am by my divine Founder perpetually
maintained.”
3. Against this claim many forms of rejection are found, each with its
type of argument: as, that the claim conflicts with the ascertained
results of Physical Science: that it advances a particular affirmation
not based on the only proofs admissible by reason: that the objector
discovers in the Church not the marks of holiness which should
accompany such a claim, but rather of evil, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account