[Greek: EURAKYDON] B (sic) [Greek: EURAKYLON] [Symbol: Aleph]A [Greek: EURAKELON] [Greek: EUTRAKELON] [Greek: EURAKLEDON] Peshitto. [Greek: EURAKYKLON] Euroaquilo Vulg. [Greek: EUROKLYDON] HLP [Greek: EURAKLYDON] Syr. Harkl. [Greek: EURYKLYDON] B^{2 man.} [82] [Greek: Opou] ([Greek: ou] [Symbol: Aleph]) [Greek: gar] (--[Greek: gar] [Symbol: Aleph]BDL) [Greek: ean] ([Greek: an] D) [Greek: to ptoma] ([Greek: soma] [Symbol: Aleph]). [83] _Sancti Dei homines._ [84] _Ap._ Galland. x. 236 a. [85] Trin. 234. [86] iii. 389. [87] '_Locuti sunt homines D_.' [88] Their only supporters seem to be K [i.e. Paul 117 (Matthaei's Sec.)], 17, 59 [published in full by Cramer, vii. 202], 137 [Reiche, p. 60]. Why does Tischendorf quote besides E of Paul, which is nothing else but a copy of D of Paul? [89] Chrys. xii. 120 b, 121 a. [90] Theodoret, iii. 584. [91] J. Damascene, ii. 240 c. [92] St. Matt. xxvii. 17. [93] Cf. [Greek: ho legomenos Barabbas]. St. Mark xv. 7. [94] _Int._ iii. 918 c d. [95] On the two other occasions when Origen quotes St. Matt. xxvii. 17 (i. 316 a and ii. 245 a) nothing is said about 'Jesus Barabbas.'-- Alluding to the place, he elsewhere (iii. 853 d) merely says that '_Secundum quosdam Barabbas dicebatur et Jesus._'--The author of a well-known scholion, ascribed to Anastasius, Bp. of Antioch, but query, for see Migne, vol. lxxxix. p. 1352 b c (= Galland. xii. 253 c), and 1604 a, declares that he had found the same statement 'in very early copies.' The scholion in question is first cited by Birch (Varr. Lectt. p. 110) from the following MSS.:--S, 108, 129, 137, 138, 143, 146, 181, 186, 195, 197, 199 or 200, 209, 210, 221, 222: to which Scholz adds 41, 237, 238, 253, 259, 299: Tischendorf adds 1, 118. In Gallandius (Bibl. P. P. xiv. 81 d e, _Append._), the scholion may be seen more fully given than by Birch,--from whom Tregelles and Tischendorf copy it. Theophylact (p. 156 a) must have seen the place as quoted by Gallandius. The only evidence, so far as I can find, for reading '_Jesus_ Barabbas' (in St. Matt. xxvii. 16, 17) are five disreputable Evangelia 1, 118, 209, 241, 299,--the Armenian Version, the Jerusalem Syriac, [and the Sinai Syriac]; (see Adler, pp. 172-3). CHAPTER V. ACCIDENTAL CAUSES OF CORRUPTION. IV. Itacism. [It has been already shewn in the First Volume that the Art of Transcription on vellum did not reach perfection till after the lapse of many centuries in the life of the Church. Even in the minute elements of writing much uncertainty prevailed during a great number of successive ages. It by no means followed that, if a scribe possessed a correct auricular knowledge of the Text, he would therefore exhibit it correctly on parchment. Copies were largely disfigured with misspelt words. And vowels especially were interchanged; accordingly, such change became in many instances the cause of corruption, and is known in Textual Criticism under the name 'Itacism.']