The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In Belgium, Bavaria, and Portugal, the regulations of the Index were
formally adopted under royal edicts. Spain adhered to the policy of
leaving in the hands of the Spanish Inquisition the responsibility for
the preparation, and for the enforcement of, the successive Indexes,
and neither the Index of Trent nor any other issued under papal
authority was ever accepted as binding within the Spanish dominions.
The Ten Tridentine Rules were however adopted in the Spanish Indexes
appearing after 1564. In France and in Germany (outside of Bavaria)
the Index of Trent was confirmed and promulgated only by one or two
provincial synods. It is evident that in these countries the Rules
secured no general acceptance or authority. Reusch adduces as evidence
that the Roman authorities held the Tridentine Index to be universal in
its authority, certain instructions given in 1580 by Gregory XIII to
Toletus. Toletus, who had been sent to Germany and the Low Countries as
a papal representative, was empowered to absolve from excommunication
and from other ecclesiastical penalties, believers who had for
scholarly purposes retained or read books condemned as heretical,
provided they would promise to abandon the pernicious practice.
The decrees in regard to book-production issued during the succeeding
twenty years by the provincial synods of Italy repeated in substance
the regulations of Trent, with an occasional addition. In Milan for
instance, in 1583, the synod ordered that printers and booksellers
must, before securing permission to begin business, make a confession
of faith to the bishops and take an oath to conduct their business
according to the regulations of the Index.
In a number of the dioceses of France, similar edicts were issued,
but these made no reference to the papal Indexes. In 1566, King
Henry II ordered (at the instance of the theological faculty of the
Sorbonne) that no books prohibited by said faculty should be printed,
owned, or read. Further, he authorised the Sorbonne to make personal
examination of the stock of the booksellers. The supervision exercised
by the Sorbonne over the production and distribution of books worked
to the detriment of the book-trade of Paris, and to the advantage of
the printers and dealers of Lyons, Montpellier, and other provincial
centres, where it proved to be impracticable to enforce the regulations
of the Paris theologians. It was also a factor in building up in
Holland (which was practically free from censorship) the business of
producing books for the students of Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account