The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Paul’s editors had placed the name of Erasmus in Class I (authors
all of whose writings were condemned) and had added a specification
which is connected with no other name, not even those of Luther and
Calvin: “with all his commentaries, criticisms, scholia, dialogues,
letters, translations, books, and writings, including those which have
nothing to do with the subject of religion.” In the Index commission
of Trent, after sharp discussions, this Draconian judgment was
materially modified. The name of Erasmus was placed in Class II, in
connection with the titles _Colloquia_, _Encomium Moriae_, _Christiani
Matrimonii Institutio_, and the _Paraphrasis in Matteum_ (as printed in
an Italian version under the name of Bernardine Tointano). The other
writings, including those that had already been condemned in Paris and
in Louvain, were left free. For the _Adagia_, a specific authority
was given to Paulus Manutius for the publication of an edition. Until
this edition should be in readiness, permission was given for the
use of the existing editions (the most noteworthy was that printed
in 1498 by Aldus), after certain reprehensible or doubtful passages
had been eliminated under the authority of the Inquisition or of a
theological faculty. In 1590, under the authority of Sixtus V, Erasmus
was again placed in Class I, and all of his writings “whatever their
subject-matter,” with the exception of the expurgated _Adagia_, were
condemned. In 1596, Clement VIII again confirmed for the writings
of Erasmus the classification of Pius IV. In the Spanish Indexes,
the name of Erasmus was, after 1612, retained in Class I. In 1575,
the expurgated edition of the _Adagia_ was issued in Rome under the
authority of the Church, without the name of the author. It would
be a little difficult to secure from these varying pronouncements
a trustworthy impression as to the final conclusions of the Church
authorities in regard to the seriousness of the heresies contained in
the writings of this scholarly Catholic or as to the actual value of
the books.
In the preface to the Trent Index, it is stated that those writers are
to be placed in Class I who are known as heretics or who are suspected
of heresy (_nota haeresis suspecti_). This phrase is capable of
varying interpretations and would appear to have been worded in order
to cover the cases of writers like Erasmus, who while refusing to class
themselves with the Protestants, had written or spoken with sharp
criticism of the Church. As a result of such an instruction, writers
like Staupitz, Pirckheimer, Hamer, and Billicanus find place in Class
I. There also were included by Paul, Rhenanus and Zasius, who were by
the Trent editors transferred to Class II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account