The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The compilers had discovered the pernicious character of a monograph
by William Camden, published in London in 1584, under the patronage of
Lord Robert Cecil. Camden undertook to prove that there had been under
Elizabeth no persecution of the Catholics on the ground of their faith.
In the same group, finds place the title of the monograph by John Knox
(but the author’s name is not given) described as _Liber Contra
Regimen Feminarum_; the original English title, _The First Blast
of the Trumpet against the Monstruous Regiment and Empire of Women_,
is correctly printed for the first time in the Index of Benedict,
1758. The edition of the monograph that came into consideration with
the Sistine compilers had been printed in Geneva in 1558. The original
issue had been censured (under the directions of Queen Elizabeth)
by the Archbishop of Canterbury and in 1583 was condemned by the
University of Oxford. No sufficient cause appears for the prohibition
of the _Chronology_ of Gerard Mercator. In 1663, the famous atlas
of Mercator was placed on the prohibited list, a prohibition that was
confirmed by Benedict a century and a half later. It is possible that
the dedication to Queen Elizabeth of these two books may have worked
to their prejudice. The introduction to the treatise _De Mundi
Creatione_, which is printed with the atlas, contains some remarks
in regard to the six days’ work of creation which may have been thought
to be dangerous.
The historians are of opinion that succeeding popes, and the Church
itself, believed it to be essential for the interest of the Church to
suppress this erratic and exceptional production of Pope Sixtus, and
as far as any continued influence of the Index itself was concerned,
such a result was certainly secured. Hilgers takes the ground that
this Index, never having been published, is not to be classed as an
authentic utterance of the Church. There is a curious reference,
made in the Index published six years later by Clement VIII, to the
intention that had been formed by Sixtus for the preparation of an
Index and to the fact that he (Sixtus) had departed this life without
carrying this plan into execution. The words of Clement are as follows:
_Verum cum idem Sixtus, re minime absoluta, ab hominis excesserit:
Nos hoc tempore omnino perficiendum atque in lucem edendum duximus._
Gregoris Lati, the biographer of Pope Sixtus, describes the special
purpose of a printing-office instituted by him. The description is
thought to indicate that some considerable “purification” was at times
found advisable in the text of editions issued through the papal press:
_Non lungi della Libraria_ [the Vatican] _vi fece fabricare Sixto
una Stampa capacissima, acciò che i Libri corotti, e profanati dagli
Heretici, e pieni di gravissimi errori si emendassero e si reducissero
al primiero candore, ed alla prima puritá, e si rimettessero, alla loro
sincera verita, stampandosi, e publicandosi con migliore ordine, e
regola._[171]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account