The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Each decree, emanating from the different authorities, is here given
separately and at length, thus presenting a convenient summary of the
sources from which originate the prohibitions and criticisms in the
Indexes. The series comprises edicts of the Inquisition, edicts of the
Congregation of the Index, edicts of the master of the sacred palace,
and decrees of the pope, and extends from the year 1601 to 1629. The
Index with which the series of edicts is printed as a sequel bears
date 1632. In a second edition, issued in 1640, the series of edicts
is brought down to 1637. The master of the sacred palace, whose name
appears in the first decrees issued by that official, was Brasichelli,
whose abortive _Index expurgatorius_ has already been referred to.
Four of the decrees issued by his successor, Lud. Ystella, in the years
1609 and 1610, were the subjects of severe animadversion on the part of
Fra Paolo Sarpi of Venice.
In the _Discorso_ concerning the Inquisition at Venice, printed
in 1638, Sarpi complains of an attempt on the part of the Papacy to
undermine and to violate the Concordat instituted in 1596 between
Rome and the Venetian Republic. In the Concordat, it is stipulated
that no other Index than the Clementine is to have force in Venice.
In the two decrees in question it is declared that the Indexes and
separate decrees issued since 1596 are to be “in force in all cities,
territories, and places, of whatsoever kingdom, nation, and people, and
are to have authority, in whatsoever way, even without publication, the
edicts should be made known.” Such a claim on the part of the Papacy
certainly appears to constitute an attempt to invalidate the conditions
of the Concordat and to give grounds for the criticisms of the intrepid
defender of the independence of the Republic.
The 66th decree (1644) is directed against the _Lettres Provinciales_
of Pascal; and makes a separate condemnation of each of the eighteen
letters. This author ought certainly to have remained in favour with
the Church. In number seventeen of these _Lettres Provinciales_ he
expresses himself thus: _Grâce à Dieu, je n’ai d’attaches sur la
terre qu’à la seule Église Catholique, Apostolique et Romaine, dans
laquelle je veux vivre et mourir, et dans la communion avec la Pape
son souverain chef, hors de laquelle je suis très persuadé qu’il n’y a
point de salut_. It would appear, however, as if some wave of Jesuitism
must have influenced Pope Innocent X at the time this condemnation was
issued. It may easily be understood that from the point of view of the
Jesuits, Pascal could hardly be considered a good Churchman.
Decree number seventy-seven, issued by Pope Alexander VII, January
12, 1661, states that some sons of perdition had arrived at such a
condition of madness as to turn the Roman missal into the vulgar tongue
of the French.
CHAPTER XII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account