The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
As examples of the character of the expurgations which find place
in the Spanish Indexes may be cited the following: Sotomayor orders
the cancellation, in bibliographies or other works of reference, of
the following terms when applied to names of writers standing in
the general Index in Class I: _vir optimus, pius, bonae memoriae,
doctissimus sapientissimus, princeps eruditorum, divinus (Scaliger),
Germaniae lumen (Melanchthon), decus saeculi nostri, etc._ It
is however permitted to describe Buchanan as a “poet of elegance,”
Henricus Stephanus as “learned in Greek scholarship,” Tycho Brahe as “a
distinguished mathematician and astronomer”; because the attainments
so indicated are the gift of God and have not been utilised, at least
directly, against the true faith. The Spanish editor goes on to say,
that such titles as doctor and _magister_ can, strictly speaking,
properly be ascribed to no one outside of the Church; the reference
is to cases in which these titles have been given by heretical
universities whose authority is not recognised by the Church. The title
_Dominus_ can however be permitted.
The expurgatory lists of Sotomayor include the title of the _Vitae
Germanorum_ of Adams; the expurgations comprise thirteen folio
sheets. There are certain interpolations comprising such terms as
_notam auctoris damnati_ or _homo damnatae memoriae_, etc. In the
_Bibliographica critica_, of Michael Josephus, published in Madrid in
1740, the author says in his introduction:
“In the specification of works of heretics I have taken pains
to avoid using any terms of commendation; for it is certainly
not right that infamous persons who have fallen away from the
true Catholic faith should in any fashion be honoured. Certain
Catholic writers have on the other hand contended that heretical
authors whose work had been devoted to subjects outside of
theology or religion, such for instance as philology, geography,
profane history, jurisprudence, and the like, could very
properly be commended for their contributions to learning. To
this suggestion I should respond that I am prepared to recognise
the possibility of heretics possessing learning and talents, and
that certain heretics have written on certain subjects works
which may be of use to Catholics; but it seems to me entirely
improper to give any measure of praise to such men who have
failed to use for the support of the true faith the abilities
with which they have been endowed by the Lord. They can receive
enough praise from their heretical friends and it would tend to
make them intellectually insolent to learn that they had been
honoured also by Catholics.”
_8._ _1664._ _Rome._ _Alexander VII._ The Index of Alexander, which
in chronological order belongs at this point in the schedule, is
considered separately in Chapter XIII.
_9._ _1707._ _Madrid._ _Index Prohibitorius et Expurgatorius._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account