The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
labours as had, in all organised communities, been for centuries
assured for other classes of producers.
Against such obstacles and difficulties, the recognition of literary
productions as property and the actual commercial value of the labour
of literary workers had, through the first century of printing been
making an assured, though fitful and interrupted, progress. Early in
the 16th century, however, the rulers of the State and the authorities
of the Church began to find occasion for alarm at the increasing range
of influence of the printed word, and came to the conclusion that if
the community was not to be undermined by heretical, dangerous, and
demoralising opinions, measures must be taken to maintain supervision
and control over the production of books.
The interference on the part of the political rulers was fitful and
intermittent, and appears at no time to have arrived at the dignity
of a continued policy or system. In a number of States, while the
rulers continued to claim for themselves the exclusive control of
the printing-press (as was, for instance, the case with Spain,
France, and the Holy Roman Empire), they were willing to confide to
the ecclesiastics the selection of the books to be condemned and
prohibited. The actual work of censorship, at least in the countries
which remained Catholic, fell, therefore, more and more into the hands
of the Church, and was, as a result, carried on with reference to
the clerical standard of orthodoxy and morality, and to the clerical
theories of what was required for the welfare of the community.
In the series of the Indexes, the proportion of works of a purely
political character was small as compared with the long lists of books
which had been condemned on doctrinal grounds. It is in order, however,
to bear in mind, as a limitation of this statement, that during the
two centuries in which censorship was the most active and exerted the
largest influence upon intellectual development, say from 1550 to 1750,
the minds of men were directed more largely to doctrinal questions
than to political matters. It was not the State but the Church whose
authority and existence had been assailed and the contest was fought
out over creeds and not political platforms.
When, with the outbreak of the Reformation movement, it became apparent
how great a range of influence was possessed by the printed sheet, the
problem which confronted the authorities of the Church was certainly
serious in more ways than one. For the space of fifteen centuries, the
education of the people had remained almost exclusively under the
direction of the Church. The faithful believers (and the unbelievers
were but few) had accepted their entire intellectual sustenance at
the hands of the priests. The instruction given in the parish schools
instituted by the Church was almost entirely oral, although some use
was made of written alphabet tables and of written psalters with the
musical notations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account