The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The _Augustinus seu doctrina S. Augustini de humanae naturae sanitate,
aegritudine et medicina, adversus Pelagianas et Massilienses_, was
published in 1640, in three volumes folio. The first is devoted to a
historical exposition of the Pelagian and Massilian (semi-Pelagian)
heresies; the second sets forth the Augustinian doctrine as to the
state of innocence and the fallen state; while the third treats, in ten
books, of the grace of Christ. The sting of the work is to be found in
the epilogue, which draws a parallel in various particulars between
the errors of the Massilians and those _recentiorum quorumdam_, the
reference being to the Jesuits. In 1641, the book was prohibited by the
Inquisition, but no opinion was pronounced as to its doctrine, and the
answering treatises of the Jesuits were also condemned.
In March, 1642, a Bull of Urban VIII confirms this decree of the
Inquisition in spite of the continued pressure on the part of the
divines of Louvain to secure a modification of the original judgment.
In 1643, Urban VIII published the Bull _In eminenti_, renewing and
confirming the constitutions of Pius V and Gregory XIII and the
decree of Paul V, and forbidding the reading of the _Augustinus_. The
publication of this Bull resulted in the production by Arnauld, in 1644
and in 1645, of _Apologies for Jansen_, and was also the text for the
famous _Provincial Letters_ of Pascal, which appeared in 1656.
In 1651, eighty-five French bishops made representations in Rome
calling for the specific condemnation of five propositions contained
in the treatise of Jansen. A statement was made a little later by
certain other bishops pointing out that the propositions in question
were open to a different interpretation from that named in the original
complaint. The matter was referred to a special congregation of four
cardinals, by whom it was again referred to a commission of thirteen
theologians selected by the Inquisition. This second commission gave
permission to the two parties to submit, in writing or in person,
further arguments in regard to the matter at issue. In May, 1653,
Innocent X condemned, in a Bull, the five propositions.
The text of the five propositions is as follows:
1. There are some commandments of God which just men, although willing
and anxious to obey them, are unable with the strength they have to
fulfil, and the grace by which they might fulfil them is also wanting.
2. In the state of fallen nature, inward grace is never resisted.
3. In the fallen state, merit and demerit do not depend on a liberty
which excludes necessity, but on a liberty which excludes constraint.
4. The semi-Pelagians admitted the necessity of an inward prevenient
grace for the performance of each particular act, and also for the
first act of faith, and yet were heretical inasmuch as they maintained
that this grace was of such a nature that the will of man was able
either to resist or to obey it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account