The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
From this time on, the main question turns upon the range or extent of
the authority of the Church and particularly of the infallibility (in
this matter of interpretation) of the pope. In a Bull of 1656, issued
by Alexander VII as a result of an understanding with Louis XIV, it is
ordered that all bishops, priests, monks, and nuns shall subscribe to a
formula of which the following is the substance:
“I accept in full the authority of the Bull of Innocent X of May
31, 1653, and the Bull of Alexander VII of October, 1656, and
I reject and condemn without reservation the five propositions
referred to in these Bulls cited from the _Augustinus_ of
Jansen, in the sense which the author intended should be given
to said propositions, in which sense said propositions have been
condemned by the Holy See. I solemnly swear to abide by this
statement, so help me God and the holy Apostles.”
Four French bishops gave out in June, 1665, statements in which they
declared that this formula was to be subscribed to with reservation
in regard to the actual facts of doctrine contained in the series
of papal bulls. These diocesan letters were themselves, in January,
1667, prohibited by the Congregation of the Index. The negotiations
of the pope with the French Government in regard to further action
against the four bishops was interrupted by the death in May, 1667, of
Alexander VII. Under Alexander’s successor, Clement IX, an agreement
was arrived at, the so-called “Peace of Clement,” by which the four
bishops gave their signatures to the formula and addressed a memorial
to the pope, stating that they were now prepared to condemn the five
propositions without reservation of any kind in the sense in which
these propositions had already been condemned by the Holy See. During
the next ten years, the subscription to the formula was very generally
made throughout France, with the same specific statement as that given
by the four bishops to the pope. In this manner was finally brought to
a close the Jansenist issue. In connection with this controversy, were
placed upon the Index the titles of some hundred books, monographs,
and pamphlets, chiefly by French authors. The list includes no less
than twenty writings of Arnauld. The Spanish Index of 1707 contains
the condemnation of the original work of Jansen, and of the five
propositions, together with a general prohibition of all writings
supporting these propositions. These hundred titles constituted but
a very small fragment of the enormous mass of literature that was
brought into print in France, in Holland, and in North Germany as a
result of the controversy. One work, especially characteristic of the
spirit of the time, may deserve more specific mention; the calendar for
1654, issued by certain Jesuits under the title of _La Déroute et
la confusion des Jansénistes_, contains a frontispiece on copper;
giving on the one side a view of the pope surrounded by cardinals
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account