The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=2. The Bull Unigenitus.=--Pasquier Quesnel (1634–1719) published in
1671, the first part of his _Commentary on the New Testament_. The
completed work was prohibited in 1708, in a brief of Clement XI. In
1675, Quesnel published an edition of the works of Leo the Great, the
notes to which he utilised for a defence of Gallican liberties. This
work was placed on the Index in 1676. In 1685, finding himself unable
to subscribe to a document in condemnation of Jansenism, Quesnel
retired from Orleans to Brussels. There, as a result in part of his
association with Arnauld, he completed, in 1695, under the title of
_Reflexions Morales sur le Nouveau Testament_, the _Commentary_, the
first part of which had been issued in 1671.
At the instance of Louis XIV, Clement issued in September, 1713, the
Bull _Unigenitus_ in which the condemnation of the Commentary of
Quesnel is confirmed and a hundred and one propositions selected from
the Commentary are specifically condemned. In the case of a number
of these propositions, no specification is given in the Bull for the
ground of their disapproval, and it was contended by the supporters of
Quesnel that it was not possible to point out in these any utterance of
heresy or of unsound doctrine.
The following propositions may be cited as representing the character
of the series:
_79. Utile, et necessarium est omni tempore, omni loco, et omni
personarum generi studere, et cognoscere spiritum, pietatem, et
mysteria Sacrae Scripturae_ (It is useful and necessary at all
times, in every place, and for every sort of person, to study and know
the spirit, the piety, and the mysteries of Holy Scripture).
_80. Lectis Sacrae Scripturae est pro omnibus_ (The reading of Holy
Scripture is for all).
_81. Obscuritas sancta Verbi Dei non est laicis ratio dispensandi se
ipsos ab ejus lectione_ (The sacred obscurity of the Word of God is
no reason for the laity to absolve themselves from the reading of it).
_82. Dies Dominicus a Christianis debet sanctificari lectionibus
pietatis, et super omnia Sanctarum Scripturarum. Damnosum est velle
Christianum ab hac lectione retrahere._ (The Lord’s day should be
kept holy by Christians by pious reading, and above all by the reading
of Holy Scripture. It is hurtful for a Christian to wish to withdraw
from such readings).
_83. Est illusio, sibi persuadere, quod notitia Mysteriorum Religionis
non debeat communicari foeminis, lectione sacrorum librorum. Non ex
foeminarum simplicitate, sed ex superba Virorum scientia, ortus est
Scripturarum abusus, et natae sunt haereses._ (It is a mistake to
believe that knowledge of the mysteries of religion ought not to be
communicated to women by the reading of the holy books. Not from the
simplicity of women, but from the haughty science of men has the abuse
of the Scriptures arisen and have heresies been born.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account