The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
After 1731, the Parliament of Paris took action antagonistic to the
position of the so-called Curialist bishops (the bishops who had
given their adhesion to the full contentions of the Holy See) more
particularly with reference to the policy pursued by these bishops
in refusing to the Appellants the privilege of the sacraments and of
burial in consecrated ground. The bishops had question among themselves
in regard to the recognition of the authority of the Parliament to take
action in a matter so purely ecclesiastical, and they made application
to Rome for instructions. In a brief issued in October, 1756, Benedict
XIV decided that the sacraments should be denied only to the more
strenuous and noteworthy of the opponents of the Bull. This decision
caused no little dissatisfaction to the more bitter of the antagonists
of the Appellants, particularly because the Pope had referred to the
Bull not as expressing a final and immutable conclusion of the Church,
but simply as a papal utterance which was entitled to respectful
acceptance.
The Indexes of Innocent XIII and Clement XII contain the titles of
about one hundred works which had come into print as a result of
the controversies concerning the Bull. The list includes twenty-two
official publications (decrees, pastoral letters, appeals to Rome,
etc.) of the French bishops, and four edicts of the Parliament of
Paris. These official documents were for the greater part condemned
under the authority of the Inquisition, but in a few instances, the
condemnation was arrived at by a papal brief. In the case of Colbert,
Bishop of Montpellier, and of Caylus, Bishop of Auxerre, the entire
works were prohibited, on the ground, apparently, of certain utterances
in sympathy with the Appellants. The hundred prohibited works comprised
but a small proportion of the mass of literature in regard to the
controversy that came into print. For the purpose of meeting the
risk of the omission of controversial writings of importance, the
Inquisition had, as early as February, 1717, prohibited all writings in
which the Bull might be in any manner opposed or criticised, directly
or indirectly. This prohibition, as worded, appears to cover not only
works at that time in existence, but all others of the character
specified which might later be printed or written.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account