The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
_402._ _Innocent I_ writes: “I have read through the treatise of
Pelagius. I found in this much that was antagonistic to the Grace of
God, much that was blasphemous, and hardly anything that was deserving
of approval. The book is one the evil influence of which each believer
ought to be able to recognise for himself and to condemn.” This papal
utterance is, of course, not to be classed as a prohibition. I make
place for it in the schedule because it is an early expression of the
literary policy that is now, fifteen centuries after Innocent, being
followed by the Church, namely, to characterise pernicious books and
to place upon believers the responsibility of condemning them for
themselves.
_431._ _The Council of Ephesus_ condemns the errors and the writings of
the Nestorians.
_435._ _The Emperor Theodosius_ issues an edict forbidding the
possession, the reading, or the copying of the Nestorian books, and
ordering existing copies to be delivered up for burning.[16]
_436._ _Theodosius_ issues an edict forbidding the possession and the
reading of the books of the Manichaeans and ordering the burning of the
same.[17]
_446._ _Pope Leo I_ issues an edict ordering destruction of the books
of Porphyry and of Origen, and the writings of the Nestorians, the
Manichaeans, the Eunomians, the Montanists, the Eutychians, and all
others which were antagonistic to the Christian religion, and which
were not in accord with the teachings of the Synods of Nicaea and
Ephesus. The prohibition reads: “Whoever owns or reads these books is
to suffer extreme punishment.”
_494._ Under _Pope Gelasius I_, was issued what is afterwards referred
to as the first papal Index. It was a catalogue of works prohibited,
and is so cited in the Decretals of Gratian. It was, however, not
properly a prohibitory Index, in that it has to do, not with private
and general, but with public or official reading.
_496._ _Pope Gelasius_ issues a decree, published at a council of
Rome, and confirmed in a decree of Gratian, which specifies the
patristic writings accepted and approved by the Church, and which
then proceeds to the condemnation of a long series of apocryphal
and heretical writings and writers. These writings are specified as
follows: “_Haec et omnia his similia non solum repudiata, verum etiam
ab omni Romana catholica et apostolica ecclesia eliminata atque cum
suis auctoribus auctorumque sequacibus sub anathematis indissolubili
vinculo in aeternum confitemur esse damnata._”[18] This decree, known
as the _Decretum Gelasianum_, is sometimes referred to as the earliest
example of an Index emanating from the Church. It is, however, an Index
only in a restricted sense of the term, as it does not order a general
prohibition of the reading of the works specified but calls simply for
their rejection and condemnation. The phrase _omnia his similia_ is
curiously vague for an Index specification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account