The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The excommunication which is made applicable to heretical writings
is, for the most part, the _excommunicatio major_. This excludes the
condemned from the Sacraments, and from the holding of office (as under
the _excommunicatio minor_), and also excludes from public worship
and from burial in consecrated ground; while it involves the loss of
legal rights. It is also, as a rule, _latae_ (instead of _ferendae_)
_sententiae_, that is, its authority goes into effect at once, as a
necessary result of the sinful action, and without the requirement of
a judgment.[89] The Jesuit Faure states that, in the earlier ages of
the Church, the _censura latae sententiae_ was ordered but seldom,
but since the 13th century, the instances of its use had very largely
increased, and (in connection with the supervision of publications) had
become almost a routine.
_1770._ _Clement XIV_ orders that the yearly publication of the Bull be
discontinued, but the Bull itself was not recalled or modified.
_1869. Oct._ _Pius IX_ issues a Bull recalling or modifying certain of
the provisions of the _Coenae Domini_.[90]
Peignot (writing in 1806) speaks of this as “an inconceivable Bull
rejected by France and by nearly all of the Catholic States and very
properly condemned to eternal oblivion.” He goes on to say that
“Rome no longer lays claim to the chimerical right of disposing
crowns and of controlling kings. It is to-day more sparing of those
invisible thunder-blasts which in times past have caused sovereigns to
tremble.”[91]
Cardinal Erskine, speaking in 1815, declares the Bull to be
“implicitly in vigour in all its extension,” and defines it as a
“public declaration to preserve the rights of the Pope.” Dr. Sleven,
the Prefect of the Dunboyne Establishment, speaking in 1826, states
that “the publication of the Bull during the coming year is something
entirely within the option of the Pope.”[92]
Count Ferdinand dal Pozzo, a Roman Catholic, writing (in Vienna) in
1825, says: “The reading of the Bull, originally ordered for every year
at Rome on Holy Thursday (Maundy Thursday), was suspended by Clement
XIV, to avoid giving offence to crowned heads.” Mendham,[93] in quoting
dal Pozzo, points out that the Bull itself (which, he says “contains a
series of the most absurd pretensions) was not revoked. Permission is
still granted to absolve in the cases reserved in this Bull.”
CHAPTER VI
THE ROMAN INQUISITION AND THE CONGREGATION OF THE INDEX.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account