The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1439, the Council of Basel decreed that the doctrine of the
Immaculate Conception must be held by all orthodox Catholics. The
divines of the Sorbonne, in 1497, issued an order referring to the
above decree and instructing that each candidate for the doctorate
must be prepared to maintain this doctrine. The decree of the council
was naturally not confirmed in Rome, but in 1483, a Bull of Sixtus IV
condemned the contention that the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception
is heretical and that the observance of the festival instituted under
this name is in itself sinful. At the same time, however, he prohibits
the declaring of the contrary doctrine as in itself heretical. In 1661,
a Bull of Alexander VII says, while confirming the approval given by
his predecessors to the doctrine, that it is not to be permitted to
charge with heresy or with mortal sin those who have not accepted
this doctrine, as the Church universal and the Holy Chair are not yet
prepared to decide all the difficulties involved. In 1708, Clement
XI declares that the festival of the Immaculate Conception is to be
universally observed, but in the same year he orders to be confiscated
and prohibited a reprint of the Bull in which this festival was first
instituted. Gregory VII was the first Pope who permitted the term
Immaculate Conception to find place in the Book of the Mass and to have
included in the Laurentian Litany the words _Regina sine labe originali
concepta_. In 1854, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is
confirmed by Pius IX as a dogma of the Church. Through some oversight,
the _Decretum Gen._, ii, 2, continued, however, to find place in
the Index that was published in 1854. In December, 1854, is printed
in connection with the publication of the _Decreta_ a declaration
in substance as follows: “As the dogma of Immaculate Conception has
now been authoritatively defined, works which treat of the same and
which have in previous years been placed in the Index, are now to be
eliminated from the Index, unless it may be that certain of these works
are entitled to condemnation on grounds other than their conclusions in
regard to this doctrine.” It appears therefore that no prohibition now
rests upon books, whether placed on the earlier Indexes or not, which
make defence of the doctrine.
The first important book written in defence of the doctrine of the
Immaculate Conception which was formally condemned, was the work of the
Italian Capucin, J. O. Maria Zamora, _De eminentissimae Deiparae V.
M. perfectione_, published in Venice in 1629 and placed on the Index
in 1636. The list of prohibitions of the works of this group during
the succeeding half-century is very considerable. I will note here but
one additional title, _Quatres Sonnets à l’honneur de la très-pure
et très-immaculée conception de la Vierge Marie_, by le Père Anne
Joachim de Jésus-Marie.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account