The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
2. One may not say that it is unlawful only to receive extortionate
interest or to take interest from the poor.
3. It may be permitted for the lender to receive some return or
compensation for his service from some person other than the borrower
or person benefited; but it may not be permitted to make provision that
such second person or guarantor should always be at hand.
In 1746, the year following the publication of the encyclical, Maffei
had published a second edition of his treatise, which bears the imprint
of the master of the palace. In a letter printed in this edition,
Maffei writes that he had not as yet learned what had been the precise
subject of condemnation in the encyclical. He was, however, of the
opinion that he had been able in his treatise to anticipate the
doctrine of the encyclical.
In the same year, Concina brought into print three essays in which he
makes sharp criticism of the heresies of Broedersen and Maffei. These
essays are dedicated to the pope. Muratori, writing in February, 1747,
says: “A curious history is this! The Holy Father accepts dedication on
the one hand from Concina and on the other from Maffei and yet neither
the one nor the other is to be classed as unsound or heretical.”
After 1820, there arose also in France an active controversy on the
question of interest. The earlier orthodox opinion adverse to the use
of interest was maintained by Abbé Pages in his treatise _Dissertation
sur le prêt à intérêt_, published in 1821. The contrary view was
maintained by La Luzerne, Bishop of Langres, in his _Dissertations sur
le Prêt de Commerce_, published in 1823 in five volumes, and by the
Abbé Baronnat in _Le Prétendu Mystère de l’Usure Dévoilé_, published
in 1822. In the course of the following half-century, the question was
repeatedly brought from France and from Italy to the attention of the
Inquisition. In 1873, the Congregation of Propaganda printed together
the decisions that had been issued by the Inquisition on this subject
between 1780 and 1872. The conclusion presented in 1873 is in substance
as follows: Those who, under the authority of the law of the land, may
take interest at a moderate rate (up to five per cent.), whether laymen
or ecclesiastics, are not to be called to account in the confessional
or otherwise for so doing until it has seemed wise to the Holy See to
present a final conclusion in the matter. They must, however, hold
themselves prepared at any time to accept and to abide by the final
instruction of the Church.
=24. Philosophical Writings, between 1750 and 1800, Condemned as
Irreligious.=--In the Spanish Index, are prohibited all the writings
of Voltaire and Rousseau. The Roman Index of 1824 includes the name of
David Hume.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account