The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The work of publishing material for popular circulation begins
practically with the Reformation. It was with the great popular demand
for instruction and information which had been developed through the
work of the reformers, that there came to the people at large the
realisation of the value to them of the invention of Gutenberg, and
an understanding of its importance for the work of educating and of
organising the people and for the securing the right of individual
thought production against the oppression of Church and State. The
system of censorship, ecclesiastical and political, a system which was
to do much to hamper the development of literature and of publishing,
dates in substance from the Reformation.
The effect of the censorship of the Church on the activities of
publishers and on the production of books varied very materially, even
in those States in which the regulations of the Church were, in form
at least, accepted as authoritative. The States in which, during the
16th and 17th centuries, the work of the printer-publishers came into
conflict, in one way or another, with the censorship edicts, and in
which literary production and activity were influenced by censorship
policy, were: Italy, France, South Germany, North Germany, Switzerland,
England, Spain, the Spanish Netherlands, and Holland.
In Italy, the edicts of the Roman Inquisition and of the Congregation
of the Index having to do with the prohibition or the expurgation of
books were of course, at least in form, binding equally upon all the
States and cities in which printing-presses were at work. As a fact,
however, at no time, not even after the labours of the Council of
Trent, did it prove practicable to secure any uniformity of procedure
or of result in the enforcement of the censorship decrees throughout
the territory of the Italian peninsula. The printers of Rome were under
obligation to take immediate action in regard to the cancellation
or withdrawal from sale of books condemned. Outside of Rome, or at
least outside of the States of the Church, periods of from thirty to
ninety days were allowed within which the printers were expected to
secure knowledge of the prohibitory edicts. The Church authorities
assumed that these edicts were binding throughout the entire Catholic
world, but, outside of Italy, the printers, booksellers, or readers
were not under obligation to have knowledge of the prohibitions until
the edicts had been published by the local bishops or the local
inquisitors. It was the case that from time to time the local bishops
were not in sympathetic accord with the literary policy of Rome, and
delayed indefinitely, or declined altogether, to make publication of
the edicts. In certain of the Italian cities, of which Venice is the
most noteworthy example, the civil authorities took the ground that no
regulations concerning printing and bookselling could be considered
as in force unless and until such regulations had been confirmed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account