The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
ecclesiastical position that in the case of the Church no separation
was possible between politics and ecclesiastical dogma. In July, 1693,
Paruta, the ambassador of Venice at the Vatican, submitted to the pope
a vigorous protest against the publication of the Clementine Index,
which was then in readiness. Paruta pointed out that the commercial
importance of the book-trade in Venice at that time exceeded that of
any city in Europe; that the book-trade was in itself deserving of
protection and consideration; that a sufficient censorship was already
exercised by the _imprimaturs_ of the Council of Ten, who utilised
among their examiners the inquisitor; that the publication of this
Index would destroy the property, and might cause the ruin, of many
who, believing themselves to be safe as long as they kept within the
regulations of the Council of Trent, had published books which were now
to be prohibited in the Clementine Index; that the new Index not only
made many additions to the lists of prohibited books, but proposed a
radical change in the standard of prohibition--a great number of books
were now, on the ground of some trivial expressions, to be condemned
although they were not at all concerned with ecclesiastical or
religious questions; that it was important for the Church to keep well
affected men of learning throughout the world and that such men would
certainly be very much troubled with any measures that interfered with
scholarly undertakings and the distribution of the world’s literature.
The arguments of Paruta and similar protests that came to Rome from
Germany and from Paris had the effect of convincing the pope that
some modification of his Index was necessary. The Index, as finally
published four years later, was very much altered and diminished. Among
the omissions from the first lists were the titles of the whole class
of non-religious books printed in Venice, in behalf of which Paruta
had spoken. In 1596, the printers and publishers of Venice again found
occasion to appeal to the Senate for support against the regulations
of the Clementine Index. They found that the works that remained
prohibited in the Clementine lists, in addition to those on previous
lists the prohibitions of which were still in force, included many
that had constituted an important staple in their trade and that this
trade, particularly for export, was suffering severely. The Clementine
regulations also undertook to take away from the Venetian printers the
right to print Bibles and missals and to restrict the printing of such
books to Rome. Negotiations between the Senate and the Papacy lasted
for some months but in the end the pope gave way on the more important
points complained of, and a declaration or Concordat was agreed upon
which lessened as far as Venice was concerned the stringency of the
most objectionable features of the Index. When this Concordat had been
signed, the Senate authorised the publication of the Index. The most
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account