The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The vision of the cardinal’s hat or of the tiara must have had a
powerful effect in attracting to the papal capital the talent of
the Christian world, and particularly, of course, of Italy; but the
concentration of energies upon ecclesiastical aims and dignities may
easily have had a depressing and restricting influence on general
intellectual development, at least as expressed in literature or art.
Dejob suggests that the possession of the throne of St. Peter, held as
the chief wealth of the country, may possibly have brought intellectual
poverty to Italy as the mines of America had caused ruin to Spain.
It is the conclusion of Dejob that the crushing surveillance of
ecclesiasticism, in connection with the demoralising influences that
opulence had brought upon a society already corrupt, has been the chief
reason why the States of the Church produced fewer writers and artists
of note than are to be credited to the other Italian States; while the
Roman writers whose names are known, such as Leopardi and Caporali,
have in their work manifested an aversion rather than a patriotic
sympathy for the spirit of their home government.[98]
An examination of the list of the popes shows how seldom the choice has
fallen on any one not a native of Italy. Since Adrian VI, who died in
1523, no “foreigner” has been called to the headship of the “World’s
Church,” while of the forty-one popes who have ruled the Church since
Adrian, no less than twenty were born within the territory of the
States of the Church. Dejob (writing in the time of Pius IX) is willing
to ascribe greatness to but one pope since the 16th century, namely
Sixtus V.[99]
This impresses me as too sweepingly pessimistic, at least if we are
to consider the term greatness by the standard attained by the other
monarchs of Europe. I should suppose for instance that Benedict XIV
was entitled to a high relative position among the rulers of the 18th
century for wisdom and for capacity.
In 1561, Pius IV calls to Rome Paul Manutius, son of Aldus, to take
charge of the publication of the writings of the Fathers of the Church
and of such other works as might be selected. Pius was impressed with
the belief that the printing-press, under scholarly management, could
be made of service to the cause of the Church in withstanding the
pernicious influence of the increasing mass of the publications of the
German heretics. These Protestant pamphlets and books were not merely
undermining the authority of the Church in Germany, in Switzerland,
and in France, but were making their way into Italy itself. The first
issues of the Aldine press in Rome were the decrees of the Council of
Trent, the writings of Cyprian, and the letters of St. Jerome. The
press secured the continued support of Pius V and of Gregory XII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account