The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
A factor to be taken into account in considering the selections of
books ordered to be condemned, was the patriotism of the Italian
clergy, in whose hands rested the control of the operations of the
Congregation. They were as unwilling to characterise as pernicious
noteworthy and representative books by Italian writers, as they
were to place any one but an Italian on the throne of St. Peter.
This partisan zeal for the literary glory of Italy must frequently
have seriously interfered with the aim of securing a consistent and
effective Index and have brought upon a conscientious pope not a little
embarrassment. An example of the difficulty experienced by Rome in
enforcing a consistent censorship in the face of Italian patriotism,
on the part of ecclesiastics, no less than of laymen, is afforded by
Dante and Petrarch. Of the former, was prohibited the _De Monarchia_,
but the _Divine Comedy_, with all its bitter strictures of things
ecclesiastical, escaped condemnation and even expurgation.
The _Canzoniere_ of Petrarch were also left untouched by Rome, although
the Inquisition of Spain had characterised them most severely in the
Indexes of 1612 and 1667. It was not until 1667 that the _Satires_ of
Ariosto were placed upon the Index, while the _Comedies_ of the same
poet were never condemned although in these the poet had assailed
fiercely the trade in indulgences, and had painted a vivid picture of
the traffic carried on by the capital of the Christian world with the
blood of the apostles and martyrs.
The example of independence set by Venice in its series of contests
with the Church for the freedom of the press had a natural influence in
other cities of Italy where conditions were favourable for publishing
activity. In Florence, Pisa, Ferrara, Milan, and other cities in
which scholarship had flourished during the manuscript period,
the productions of the printing-press became, during the 15th and
16th centuries, of increasing importance. This work was frequently
interfered with and sometimes seriously hampered by the censorship
regulations of Rome and by the operations of the local inquisitors,
but it was never entirely blocked even in any one city. The feeling of
State and municipal independence and the individuality of the people
were too strong to be crushed out by Roman edicts or by the threats
of the Inquisition. In Italy as in Germany, the fact that there was
not one government in the peninsula, but a number of independent
States, helped to secure for the work of the printers some degree of
opportunity, notwithstanding the censorship edicts of the Church and
the repressive measures of the State. The presses of the day were small
and in case of trouble in one city, they could easily be moved to
another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account