The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1676, was born Benito Feyjoo, who later became a Benedictine
monk. While his life was spent in strict retirement (for forty-seven
years he remained in the convent at Oviedo), the activity of his
thought made him a fire in the community. He wrote a series of papers
published, in 1726, under the title of the _Critical Theatre_.
In these, he openly attacked the dialectics and metaphysics then
taught everywhere in Spain. Few persons at the beginning of the 18th
century were so well informed as not to believe in astrology, and fewer
still doubted the disastrous influence of comets and of eclipses. The
study of Copernicus was forbidden to be taught on the ground that
it was contrary to Scripture. The philosophy of Bacon, with all the
consequences that followed it, were unknown. In spite of the opposition
of the Inquisition, before which Feyjoo was more than once summoned,
it proved to be impracticable to suppress his investigations or his
publications. In 1742, he began a series of discussions published under
the title _Learned and Enquiring Souls_. The series was finished
in 1760. It was impossible for the Inquisition to assail the soundness
of his faith. Fifteen editions of his principal works were printed in
half a century. It is the conclusion of Ticknor that the quiet monk had
done more for the intellectual life of his country than had been done
in a century.[123]
Ticknor calculates that the number of _auto-da-fés_ during the
reign of Philip V exceeded seven hundred and eighty. It is believed
that more than twelve thousand persons were, in different ways,
subjected, under the authority of the Inquisition, to be punished and
disgraced and that more than one thousand were burned alive. Charles
III, with the assistance of his liberal ministers, was able so far to
abridge the papal power that no rescript or edict from Rome could have
force in Spain without the express consent of the throne. He restrained
the Inquisition from exercising any authority whatever except in
cases of obstinate heresy or apostacy. He forbade the condemnation
of any book until its author or those interested in it had had an
opportunity to be heard in its defence. Finally, deeming the Jesuits
the most active opponents of the reforms he was intending to enforce,
he expelled their whole body from his dominions all over the world,
breaking up their schools and confiscating their great revenues.
Certain abuses were, however, beyond his reach. When he appealed to the
universities, urging them to change their ancient habits and to teach
the truths of the physical and exact sciences, Salamanca answered
in 1771: “Newton teaches nothing that would make a good logician
or metaphysician and Gassendi and Descartes do not agree so well
with revealed truth as does Aristotle.”[124] The other universities
showed little more of the spirit of advancement. Under Charles IV, in
1805, the Inquisition, grown forcible in the hands of the Government
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account