The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
restricted to certain specified States and districts in which the
public exercise of said religion was authorised. These Protestant
books, while permitted to exist, are, however, classified as “libels
and as inflammatory writings.” It does not appear that any provision
was made for the circulation of such publications between the cities in
which they were permitted to be printed, as such circulation must, of
course, have taken them across the “good Catholic” territory, within
the boundaries of which the Protestant books were incendiary libels.
The difficulties in the way of authors and publishers of such books
must, therefore, at this time have been very considerable. In 1624,
four royal censors were instituted by letters patent. The first four
were all doctors of the theological faculty, but notwithstanding this
selection of the board from the members of the Sorbonne, the university
was dissatisfied with losing its ancient privileges of controlling
directly the examination of religious literature. In 1629, it was
ordered that works submitted for publication were to be passed upon
by censors particularly designated for each work by the Chancellor or
Privy Seal. It is probable that the volumes had to be put into type
before the examiners were willing to give the time for examination. In
1702, an issue arose between the chancellor and the higher clergy on
the question of certain general privileges in regard to printing which
the bishops claimed to be still in force. It was the contention of
the bishops that, being themselves the final judges of the doctrines
of the Church, utterances made by them or utterances accepted by
them could not with propriety be passed upon by others who were not
authorities on points of doctrine. Madame de Maintenon gave the weight
of her influence in favour of the bishops. The King dreaded exciting
the ire of the Jesuits and dreaded also, says the chronicle, the risk
of putting Madame de Maintenon into a bad temper. He avoided making a
decision and an adjustment was finally arrived at in which the bishops
withdrew their main pretensions. Bossuet made an indignant protest
against what he called the attempt of the chancellor to control the
utterances of the Church. It is not to be thought of, says Bossuet,
that the Holy Church of Christ shall be compelled to submit, for the
examination of magistrates, its decrees, catechisms, and spiritual
teachings upon matters which should be confined strictly to the
instructors of their flock. The King, influenced by the pleading of
Bossuet, finally brought himself to decide that for the works which
were at the moment in question, the authority should be left with the
bishops.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account