The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
“(Signed),
“ALOIS. CARD. MACCHI.
“ROME, Sept. 17, 1900.”
“PREFACE
“Behold, worthy reader, a new Index of the prohibited books,
revised and published with the greatest care, by direction of
His Holiness Leo XIII, P. M.; together with a syllabus of books
to be avoided, there are published also the Constitutions of
the Apostolic Chair by which the examination and proscription
of bad books are at present governed: viz.: the Constitution
‘of Offices and Duties,’ promulgated by Leo, Jan. 25, 1897, and
the Constitution ‘_Solicita ac Provida_’ by which Benedict
XIV, on July 9, 1753, established clear and firm rules for the
use of the Roman and universal Inquisition, and also of the Holy
Congregation of the Index, in examining and judging books.
“As to the Constitution of Benedict XIV, it does not apply so
much to the faithful in general as to those who are entrusted by
the Holy See with the task of examining books. The Constitution
of the present Pope has another object, since, revoking the
rules of the holy Synod of Trent, ‘it sets forth certain new
general Decretals, which are to be obeyed religiously by
Catholics everywhere.’
Furthermore, these general Decretals and the Index have this in
common, that both exist for the purpose of teaching what books
to avoid reading and owning. The Decretals, however, serve this
end in one way, the Index in another. For the Decretals prohibit
the greatest possible number, indeed almost all, of noxious and
tainted books, the reading of which is strongly forbidden by
the natural law itself; while the Index reviews and notes but a
small part of these. By the Decretals, _genera_ and classes
only of bad books are proscribed; by the Index, individual
books, each with its title and even the author’s name. Hence it
is plain how greatly they err who suppose the whole question
of improper books to be decided by the Index alone, as though
of the innumerable perverse and pernicious books which have
appeared in the course of centuries, those only are prohibited
which have been condemned by special decrees and noticed in
the catalogue of prohibited books. In fact, any given book can
only be safely declared lawful reading when these two conditions
are satisfied: it must not occur in the Index nor be contained
in any of those classes which are as a whole reprobated and
condemned by the Decretals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account