The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
Lambeth has been a seat of pottery manufacture from an early period. In
mediæval times the characteristic brown-ware pitchers, pans, tygs, &c.,
were made; and, later on, at this place was quite a colony of makers
of Delft ware, who in turn gave place to stoneware manufacturers.
China, too, appears to have been made at Lambeth from perhaps 1760,
or thereabouts. It is recorded that in the middle of the seventeenth
century the Delft ware manufacture commenced; but it is not unlikely
that Rous and Cullyn, some years earlier, here established themselves
in the making of “stone potts, stone jugs, and stone bottels,” for
which they received a patent in 1626.[50] It is conjectured, and with
some probability, that one of the Delft ware makers at this place was
John Ariens Van Hamme, a Dutchman, who had come over from the Hague
under the encouragement of our ambassador, who, as has already been
shown,[51] took out a patent in 1676 for the “art of makeinge tiles and
porcelane and other earthen wares, after the way practiced in Holland,”
and who, with his staff of workmen, probably formed the nucleus of what
was afterwards a nest of potters, comprising, according to the “History
of Lambeth,” no less than twenty manufactories. In 1693 a trial took
place in the Court of Exchequer concerning some parcels of potter’s
clay which had been seized by the Custom House officers, under pretence
that it was fuller’s earth. In this trial five London potters, William
Knight, Thomas Harper, Henry De Wilde, John Robins, and Moses Johnson,
gave evidence in favour of the clay being potter’s clay. There is
nothing in the record of this trial to identify any of the five potters
therein named with Lambeth; but the probability is that some of them
belonged to that place. One of them, William Knight, was undoubtedly
the “William Knight of the parish of St. Buttolph Without, Aldgate,
London, Pottmaker,” concerning whom I give, from the original deed in
my possession, some particulars under the head of “Aldgate;” some of
the others were, I believe, of Lambeth. The account of the trial has
been printed by my friend, Mr. Reeks, in the “Catalogue of the Museum
of Practical Geology,” and is so interesting that I here reproduce it
entire.
_A Brief Account of the Evidence given on behalf of_ Edmund
Warner, _at a_ Tryal _had at the Bar the 24th of_ November,
1693, _before the Four Barons of the_ Exchequer, _relating to a
Parcel of_ Potters Clay, _seized by the_ Custom-House _Officers,
under the pretence of it’s being_ Fullers Earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account