The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
[Illustration: Figs. 382 to 389.]
[Illustration: Fig. 390.]
[Illustration: Fig. 391.]
A singular mark (Fig. 394), communicated to me by Mr. Octavius Morgan,
M.P., occurring on some small groups of figures belonging to Lady Mary
Long, is an anchor, with cable, in red; on one side is an upright
dagger, point upwards, in red; while on the other is a horizontal
dagger, point outwards, in _blue_. This mark occurs on each piece.
Another mark is the anchor with cable, and dagger sometimes on its
right, and at others on its left side. It has been surmised that the
cabled anchor and dagger, or sword, may be Bow; but there is no reason
for supposing this to be the case, and I am inclined to believe they
are really what I have named them--Chelsea. In reference to this remark
I give the following marks, which are considered by Mrs. Palliser
to belong to Bow; but of course there is no proof either way. Those
collectors whose affections mainly centre in Chelsea ascribe pieces
having these marks to that locality, while those whose loves direct
them to the attractions of Bow, with equally as little hesitation
pronounce them to belong to those works. It seems in fact to be, in the
instance of these marks, that the collector has to act on the showman’s
advice--he “pays his money” for the rare piece of china and “takes his
choice” whether he appropriates it to Chelsea or to Bow! I am disposed
to think the anchor really is, as has always been considered, the true
Chelsea mark, and that most of the varieties belong to those works, but
that it was also used by other manufacturers, either separately or in
combination with other devices.
[Illustration: Figs. 392 to 395.]
[Illustration: Figs. 396 to 402.]
[Illustration: Fig. 403.]
It would leave my notice of the marks of the Chelsea works incomplete,
were I not to introduce the mark which was, for a time, used to denote
the fusion of these works into those of Derby. When Mr. Duesbury
purchased the Chelsea works, and carried on the two together, he added
the letter D to the Chelsea anchor (Fig. 403): and this is the mark
which denotes what is known to collectors as “Chelsea Derby” or “Derby
Chelsea” ware, and which, being of comparative rarity, is eagerly
sought after.
[Illustration: Fig. 404.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account