The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
Nothing is known definitely as to the date of the first establishment
of this very important china manufactory situated at Stratford-le-Bow.
It must, however, have been in existence some little time prior
to 1744, for in that year it was carried on by “Edward Heylyn, in
the parish of Bow, in the county of Middlesex, merchant,” who, in
conjunction with “Thomas Frye, of the parish of West Ham, in the
county of Essex, painter,” took out a patent for “a new method of
manufacturing a certain material, whereby a ware might be made of the
same nature or kind, and equal to, if not exceeding in goodness and
beauty, china or porcelain ware imported from abroad.” The patent,
which was for fourteen years, bore date the 6th of December, 1744,
and the specification was duly enrolled on the 5th of April, 1745.
This specification I have printed in full on page 112, and it will be
found of the highest interest and totally different from what is put
forth by Chaffers as a copy of it. On the 17th of November, 1748, the
same “Thomas Frye, of the parish of West Ham, in the county of Essex,
painter,” took out another patent, by which he “lawfully might make,
use, exercise, and vend my new method of making a certain ware, which
is not inferior in beauty and fineness, and is rather superior in
strength, than the earthenware that is brought from the East Indies,
and is commonly known by the name of China, Japan, or Porcelain ware.”
The specification was duly enrolled on the 17th of March, 1749, and is
highly interesting. This will be found printed entire on page 113.
[Illustration: Fig. 405.--Inkstand in possession of Mr. R. W.
Binns.]
There is nothing, it will be seen, in these patents or specifications
to show that the works at Bow were carried on by Heylin and Frye--the
one being simply described as of the “parish of Bow, _merchant_” (not
potter), and the other “of the parish of West Ham, _painter_;” nor
has anything yet been found, to my knowledge, to prove that they were
actual proprietors of the manufactory. Indeed, Frye is stated, in more
than one work, to have been engaged to _superintend_ the manufactory.
He was an artist of considerable skill, who is said to have come to
London in 1738, and soon afterwards to have painted a portrait of
Frederick, Prince of Wales, for the Saddlers’ Company. He was also a
mezzo-tint engraver of considerable note. To his skill as an artist
no doubt he was in the main indebted for the position he held at Bow;
and here it would appear he remained some fifteen years, to the great
injury of his health, and then returned to his previous occupation;
he died in 1763. His daughters are stated to have assisted him in the
painting of china at Bow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account